Sap Se

Thomas Alcantara Kliche

Michail Vasiltschenko

Yvonne Miklosch

Yu Zhang

Ralph Debusmann

Benjamin Schork

Annika Berger

Susanne Hempel

Ying Zou

Abdallah El Sahhar

Mark Childress

Hanne Smaadahl

An input terminology is received in a source language to determine a target language proposal. In a proposal engine when a configuration profile is available the following steps are performed. A set of target language equivalents are determined by applying a user-defined set of approaches to the input terminology. Statistics is computed corresponding to the set of target language equivalents. A target language proposal from the set of target language equivalents is determined based on the computed statistics. The target language proposal along with the computed statistics is displayed in a graphical user interface.

Terminology proposal engine for determining target language equivalents

Various embodiments of systems, computer program products, and methods to assess translation quality are described herein. In an aspect, a translated text is received during translation of content from a source language to a target language. The received translated text is detected as an incorrect translation by analyzing a number of quality checks in a translation quality algorithm. An error category corresponding to the incorrect translation is determined based on a root cause of the incorrect translation. Further, a counter is incremented in a corresponding error category. When the counter exceeds a threshold, an action to prevent submission of the translation is triggered based on a combined error score. The combined error score is a combined weighted error score from error categories which have exceeded their respective thresholds.

Assessing translation quality

Growing community of inventors

Wiesloch, Germany

Thomas Alcantara Kliche