The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.

The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.

Date of Patent:
Aug. 08, 2017

Filed:

Jul. 07, 2015
Applicant:

Lummus Technology Inc., Bloomfield, NJ (US);

Inventors:

Marvin I. Greene, Clifton, NJ (US);

Ujjal K. Mukherjee, Montclair, NJ (US);

Arun Arora, Bloomfield, NJ (US);

Assignee:

Lummus Technology Inc., Bloomfield, NJ (US);

Attorney:
Primary Examiner:
Assistant Examiner:
Int. Cl.
CPC ...
C10G 65/12 (2006.01); C10G 63/02 (2006.01); C10G 45/00 (2006.01); C10G 45/02 (2006.01); C10G 45/32 (2006.01); C10G 45/38 (2006.01); C10G 45/44 (2006.01); C10G 45/50 (2006.01); C10G 45/54 (2006.01); C10G 65/00 (2006.01); C10G 65/08 (2006.01); C10G 1/00 (2006.01); B01J 19/24 (2006.01);
U.S. Cl.
CPC ...
C10G 63/02 (2013.01); B01J 19/245 (2013.01); C10G 1/002 (2013.01); C10G 45/00 (2013.01); C10G 45/02 (2013.01); C10G 45/32 (2013.01); C10G 45/38 (2013.01); C10G 45/44 (2013.01); C10G 45/50 (2013.01); C10G 45/54 (2013.01); C10G 65/00 (2013.01); C10G 65/08 (2013.01); C10G 65/12 (2013.01); B01J 2219/24 (2013.01); C10G 2400/02 (2013.01); C10G 2400/04 (2013.01); C10G 2400/08 (2013.01);
Abstract

Integrated processes for upgrading crude shale-derived oils, such as those produced by oil shale retorting or by in situ extraction or combinations thereof. Processes disclosed provide for a split-flow processing scheme to upgrade whole shale oil. The split flow concepts described herein, i.e., naphtha and kerosene hydrotreating in one or more stages and gas oil hydrotreating in one or more stages, requires additional equipment as compared to the alternative approach of whole oil hydrotreating. While contrary to conventional wisdom as requiring more capital equipment to achieve the same final product specifications, the operating efficiency vis a vis on-stream time efficiency and product quality resulting from the split flow concept far exceed in value the somewhat incrementally higher capital expenditure costs.


Find Patent Forward Citations

Loading…