The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.
The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.
Patent No.:
Date of Patent:
Sep. 11, 2012
Filed:
Dec. 28, 2009
Shawn P. Firminger, Redmond, WA (US);
Jason Garms, Redmond, WA (US);
Roderick A. Hyde, Redmond, WA (US);
Edward K. Y. Jung, Bellevue, WA (US);
Chris D. Karkanias, Sammamish, WA (US);
Eric C. Leuthardt, St. Louis, MO (US);
Royce A. Levien, Lexington, MA (US);
Richard T. Lord, Tacoma, WA (US);
Robert W. Lord, Seattle, WA (US);
Mark A. Malamud, Seattle, WA (US);
John D. Rinaldo, Jr., Bellevue, WA (US);
Clarence T. Tegreene, Bellevue, WA (US);
Kristin M. Tolle, Redmond, WA (US);
Lowell L. Wood, Jr., Bellevue, WA (US);
Shawn P. Firminger, Redmond, WA (US);
Jason Garms, Redmond, WA (US);
Roderick A. Hyde, Redmond, WA (US);
Edward K. Y. Jung, Bellevue, WA (US);
Chris D. Karkanias, Sammamish, WA (US);
Eric C. Leuthardt, St. Louis, MO (US);
Royce A. Levien, Lexington, MA (US);
Richard T. Lord, Tacoma, WA (US);
Robert W. Lord, Seattle, WA (US);
Mark A. Malamud, Seattle, WA (US);
John D. Rinaldo, Jr., Bellevue, WA (US);
Clarence T. Tegreene, Bellevue, WA (US);
Kristin M. Tolle, Redmond, WA (US);
Lowell L. Wood, Jr., Bellevue, WA (US);
Abstract
A computationally implemented method includes, but is not limited to: determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes; and modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template In addition to the foregoing, other method aspects are described in the claims, drawings, and text forming a part of the present disclosure.