The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.

The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.

Date of Patent:
Mar. 28, 2006

Filed:

Jan. 13, 2003
Applicants:

Paul D. Steinberg, Bartlett, IL (US);

Richard J. Malcolm, Carol Stream, IL (US);

Joseph M. Pedziwiatr, La Grange, IL (US);

Richard E. White, Cary, IL (US);

Daniel F. Tell, Lake Forest, IL (US);

Brian J. Moore, Palatine, IL (US);

Stephen L. Spear, Skokie, IL (US);

John M. Sauer, Naperville, IL (US);

Inventors:

Paul D. Steinberg, Bartlett, IL (US);

Richard J. Malcolm, Carol Stream, IL (US);

Joseph M. Pedziwiatr, La Grange, IL (US);

Richard E. White, Cary, IL (US);

Daniel F. Tell, Lake Forest, IL (US);

Brian J. Moore, Palatine, IL (US);

Stephen L. Spear, Skokie, IL (US);

John M. Sauer, Naperville, IL (US);

Assignee:

Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, IL (US);

Attorney:
Primary Examiner:
Assistant Examiner:
Int. Cl.
CPC ...
H04L 12/26 (2006.01);
U.S. Cl.
CPC ...
Abstract

The invention provides for path optimization for routing of a communication session in a network having a plurality of core networks coupled to a plurality of access networks. Both a core network and an access network perform the path optimization by determining a plurality of possible paths to a plurality of target access points to form a target matrix, determining a corresponding route preference factor for each possible path of the target matrix, and selecting, from the target matrix, a possible path having an optimal route preference factor. An overall or complete path, for routing of the communication session, is then determined either by combining the selected possible paths, or by selecting one possible path as a complete path. The route preference factor, for each possible path, is determined based upon various routing variables, such as quality of service, bandwidth for the communication session, route complexity, interconnect cost, routing cost; resource loading, resource availability, and operator preference for traffic biasing.


Find Patent Forward Citations

Loading…