The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.
The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.
Patent No.:
Date of Patent:
Jun. 03, 2003
Filed:
Dec. 23, 1998
Paul Stephan Bedrosian, Andover, MA (US);
Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill, NJ (US);
Abstract
An enhanced synchronization status messaging capability for synchronous networks is provided in a messaging format that is compatible with existing synchronization messaging standards. Additional messages, which are based on the same predefined code words used in existing synchronous status messages, are differentially coded and carried in available, but unused message positions, in the existing messaging scheme. In one illustrative embodiment, a two part message format is used for carrying information between network elements and between a network element and a co-located BITS clock in-a synchronous network. A first part of the message format carries the traditional quality level information of synchronization references using the set of code words predefined in the applicable standards. For example, the quality information of a synchronization reference is conveyed using 7 out of 10 “like” messages selected from the group of predefined code words set forth in the standards. The second part of the message format carries one or more enhanced messages that are conveyed using the same group of predefined code words, but which are differentially coded into message positions that are available and unused in the existing standards-compliant messaging schemes. For example, additional information can be conveyed in the remaining unused 3 out of 10 messages. By differentially coding the enhanced messages relative to the standard message part, the enhanced messages will always have separately identifiable code words even if the quality level designation of a reference conveyed by the 7 out of 10 “like” messages changes during a network reconfiguration.