The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.

The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.

Date of Patent:
Jul. 14, 2026

Filed:

Dec. 13, 2024
Applicant:

Accenture Global Solutions Limited, Dublin, IE;

Inventors:

Aditya Kumar, Kanpur, IN;

Hemant Chandrakant Patil, Pune, IN;

Sarang Padmakar Joshi, Pune, IN;

Ninad Shashikant Kulkarni, Pune, IN;

Niladri Sekhar Dutta, Howrah, IN;

Karthik Ramesh, Bangalore, IN;

Sailaja Bandi, Vijayawada, IN;

Divya Dhar, Bangalore, IN;

Srenik Ravjiani, Bangalore, IN;

Assignee:
Attorney:
Primary Examiner:
Int. Cl.
CPC ...
G06F 16/3332 (2025.01); G06F 16/334 (2025.01);
U.S. Cl.
CPC ...
G06F 16/3334 (2019.01); G06F 16/3344 (2019.01);
Abstract

Method, system, and computer-readable storage media for evaluating effectiveness of a prompt are disclosed. Input data for generating the prompt is received. Based on the input data, sub-prompts are generated and each of the sub-prompts is evaluated. For evaluating a sub-prompt, a sub-response corresponding to the sub-prompt is generated, and an optimal score is computed for the sub-response. The optimal score value is computed for the sub-response by computing a score value for evaluation of each evaluation aspect of multiple evaluation aspects and computing a combined score value based on the score value computed for evaluation of each evaluation aspect. The optimal score value is compared with a predetermined threshold value. If the optimal score value exceeds the predetermined threshold value, the respective sub-prompt is determined as the most effective prompt for generating a response using a Large Language Model (LLM) corresponding to the input data.


Find Patent Forward Citations

Kumar, Aditya. (2026). Method and system for evaluating effectiveness of prompt (U.S. Patent No. 12681969). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://idiyas.com/patent/badge/12681969

Data source: USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) public patent records. Weekly synchronization. How IDiyas builds this profile

Loading…