logo

For the Inventor, By the Inventor

The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.

The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.

Patent No.:

US 11684423 B1

PDFFull Text
Date of Patent:
Jun. 27, 2023

Filed:

Mar. 12, 2020

Algorithm-based optimization for knee arthroplasty procedures

Applicants:

Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN (US);

Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics Ag, Zug, CH;

Smith & Nephew Asia Pacific Pte. Limited, Singapore, SG;

Inventors:

Brian W. Mckinnon, Arlington, TN (US);

Ruxandra Cristiana Marinescu Tanasoca, Memphis, TN (US);

Randy C. Winebarger, Southaven, MS (US);

William L. Bowers, Jr., Southaven, MS (US);

James Bennett Wiebe, Iii, Coldwater, MS (US);

Nathaniel Milton Lenz, Germantown, TN (US);

Zachary Christopher Wilkinson, Germantown, TN (US);

Sean M. Haddock, Germantown, TN (US);

Ryan Lloyd Landon, Olive Branch, MS (US);

Constantinos Nikou, Monroeville, PA (US);

Branislav Jaramaz, Pittsburgh, PA (US);

Paul Alexander Torrie, Marblehead, MA (US);

Assignees:

Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN (US);

Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG, Zug, CH;

Smith & Nephew Asia Pacific Pte. Limited, Singapore, SG;

Attorney:

DLA Piper LLP

Primary Examiner:

Ishrat I Sherali

Int. Cl.
CPC ...
A61B 34/10 (2016.01); A61B 34/00 (2016.01); G16H 20/40 (2018.01); G16H 50/50 (2018.01); G16H 10/60 (2018.01); G16H 50/70 (2018.01); A61B 17/17 (2006.01); G06N 20/00 (2019.01); A61B 90/00 (2016.01); G16H 40/63 (2018.01); G06N 20/10 (2019.01); G06N 5/046 (2023.01); A61F 2/46 (2006.01); G02B 27/01 (2006.01); G06N 3/08 (2023.01); G16H 30/40 (2018.01); G09B 19/00 (2006.01); G09B 19/24 (2006.01); A61B 17/00 (2006.01); A61B 34/20 (2016.01); A61B 34/30 (2016.01); A61B 90/96 (2016.01); A61B 17/15 (2006.01); A61B 90/50 (2016.01); A61F 2/30 (2006.01);
U.S. Cl.
CPC ...
A61B 34/10 (2016.02); A61B 17/1764 (2013.01); A61B 34/25 (2016.02); A61B 90/361 (2016.02); A61B 90/37 (2016.02); A61B 90/39 (2016.02); A61F 2/461 (2013.01); G02B 27/0172 (2013.01); G06N 3/08 (2013.01); G06N 5/046 (2013.01); G06N 20/00 (2019.01); G06N 20/10 (2019.01); G09B 19/003 (2013.01); G09B 19/24 (2013.01); G16H 10/60 (2018.01); G16H 20/40 (2018.01); G16H 30/40 (2018.01); G16H 40/63 (2018.01); G16H 50/50 (2018.01); G16H 50/70 (2018.01); A61B 17/15 (2013.01); A61B 17/17 (2013.01); A61B 34/20 (2016.02); A61B 34/30 (2016.02); A61B 90/96 (2016.02); A61B 2017/00199 (2013.01); A61B 2017/00526 (2013.01); A61B 2034/102 (2016.02); A61B 2034/104 (2016.02); A61B 2034/105 (2016.02); A61B 2034/107 (2016.02); A61B 2034/108 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2048 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2057 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2063 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2065 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2068 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2072 (2016.02); A61B 2034/2074 (2016.02); A61B 2034/252 (2016.02); A61B 2034/254 (2016.02); A61B 2034/256 (2016.02); A61B 2034/258 (2016.02); A61B 2090/363 (2016.02); A61B 2090/365 (2016.02); A61B 2090/371 (2016.02); A61B 2090/376 (2016.02); A61B 2090/3916 (2016.02); A61B 2090/502 (2016.02); A61F 2002/30952 (2013.01); A61F 2002/4633 (2013.01); G02B 2027/0138 (2013.01);
Abstract

A method for optimizing a knee arthroplasty surgical procedure includes receiving pre-operative data comprising (i) anatomical measurements of the patient, (ii) soft tissue measurements of the patient's anatomy, and (iii) implant parameters identifying an implant to be used in the knee arthroplasty surgical procedure. An equation set is selected from a plurality of pre-generated equation sets based on the pre-operative data. During the knee arthroplasty surgical procedure, patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values are generated and displayed using an optimization process. The optimization process includes collecting intraoperative data from one or more surgical tools of a computer-assisted surgical system, and using the intraoperative data and the pre-operative data to solve the equation set, thereby yielding the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values. A visualization is then provided of the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values on the displays.

Find Patent Forward Citations

Loading…