The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document.
The patent badge is an abbreviated version of the USPTO patent document. The patent badge covers the following: Patent number, Date patent was issued, Date patent was filed, Title of the patent, Applicant, Inventor, Assignee, Attorney firm, Primary examiner, Assistant examiner, CPCs, and Abstract. The patent badge does contain a link to the full patent document (in Adobe Acrobat format, aka pdf). To download or print any patent click here.
Patent No.:
Date of Patent:
Nov. 05, 2019
Filed:
Jan. 30, 2008
Michele Vivona, Seattle, WA (US);
Donald G. Peterson, Kirkland, WA (US);
Jeffrey Pfeifer, Denver, CO (US);
Kevin Stehr, Charleston, SC (US);
David Dilenschneider, Centennial, CO (US);
John Nash, San Rafael, CA (US);
William Hagy, Radnor, PA (US);
Duane Wald, Kent, WA (US);
Ryan Sanders, Kent, WA (US);
Travis J. Olson, Snoqualmie, WA (US);
Michele Vivona, Seattle, WA (US);
Donald G. Peterson, Kirkland, WA (US);
Jeffrey Pfeifer, Denver, CO (US);
Kevin Stehr, Charleston, SC (US);
David Dilenschneider, Centennial, CO (US);
John Nash, San Rafael, CA (US);
William Hagy, Radnor, PA (US);
Duane Wald, Kent, WA (US);
Ryan Sanders, Kent, WA (US);
Travis J. Olson, Snoqualmie, WA (US);
RELX INC., New York, NY (US);
Abstract
Systems and methods for profiled and focused searching of litigation information allow a user to access specific legal information for use during litigation. The user can connect to a web site and access particular information from multiple sources based on the litigation task the user wishes to accomplish One litigation task is to create a litigation profile for a target, such as a particular litigant, attorney, judge, court, or firm. In this way, the user can perform focused and task-based searching to receive information about particular filings in particular locations, made by particular entities without knowing which sources contain certain pieces of the litigation information. For example, the user can receive all documents relating to summary judgment for patent infringement filed by a particular attorney in a particular court without specifying the source of information. In one aspect, the user can also access the source(s) upon receiving the results.