Sas Institute Inc.

Yan Gao

Joshua David Griffin

Yan Xu

Steven Joseph Gardner

Yu-Min Lin

Jorge Manuel Gomes Da Silva

David Bruce Elsheimer

Seyedalireza Yektamaram

Raymond Eugene Wright

Ricky Dee Tharrington, Jr

Connie Stout Dunbar

Bengt Wisen Pederson

Kushawah Yogender Singh

Gregory Scott Dunbar

Kiran Devidas Bhole

Girish Vinayak Kolapkar

Aishwarya Sharma

Amod Anil Ankulkar

Pei-Yi Tan

A computing device selects new test configurations for testing software. (A) First test configurations are generated using a random seed value. (B) Software under test is executed with the first test configurations to generate a test result for each. (C) Second test configurations are generated from the first test configurations and the test results generated for each. (D) The software under test is executed with the second test configurations to generate the test result for each. (E) When a restart is triggered based on a distance metric value computed between the second test configurations, a next random seed value is selected as the random seed value and (A) through (E) are repeated. (F) When the restart is not triggered, (C) through (F) are repeated until a stop criterion is satisfied. (G) When the stop criterion is satisfied, the test result is output for each test configuration.

Automated machine learning test system

A computing device selects new test configurations for testing software. Software under test is executed with first test configurations to generate a test result for each test configuration. Each test configuration includes a value for each test parameter where each test parameter is an input to the software under test. A predictive model is trained using each test configuration of the first test configurations in association with the test result generated for each test configuration based on an objective function value. The predictive model is executed with second test configurations to predict the test result for each test configuration of the second test configurations. Test configurations are selected from the second test configurations based on the predicted test results to define third test configurations. The software under test is executed with the defined third test configurations to generate the test result for each test configuration of the third test configurations.

A computing device determines an optimal number of threads for a computer task. Execution of a computing task is controlled in a computing environment based on each task configuration included in a plurality of task configurations to determine an execution runtime value for each task configuration. An optimal number of threads value is determined for each set of task configurations having common values for a task parameter value, a dataset indicator, and a hardware indicator. The optimal number of threads value is an extremum value of an execution parameter value as a function of a number of threads value. A dataset parameter value is determined for a dataset. A hardware parameter value is determined as a characteristic of each distinct executing computing device in the computing environment. The optimal number of threads value for each set of task configurations is stored in a performance dataset in association with the common values.

Optimal number of threads determination system

A computing device selects decision variable values. A lower boundary value and an upper boundary value is defined for a decision variable. (A) A plurality of decision variable configurations is determined using a search method. The value for the decision variable is between the lower boundary value and the upper boundary value. (B) A decision variable configuration is selected. (C) A model of the model type is trained using the decision variable configuration. (D) The model is scored to compute an objective function value. (E) The computed objective function value and the selected decision variable configuration are stored. (F) (B) through (E) is repeated for a plurality of decision variable configurations. (G) The lower boundary value and the upper boundary value are updated using the objective function value and the decision variable configuration stored. Repeat (A)-(F) with the lower boundary value and the upper boundary value updated in (G).

Distributed decision variable tuning system for machine learning

Growing community of inventors

Cary, NC, United States of America

Yan Gao