Nanotronics Imaging, Inc.

Opennano Pte. Ltd.

Vadim Pinskiy

Matthew C Putman

John B Putman

Damas Limoge

Andrew Sundstrom

James Williams, Iii

Eun-Sol Kim

Denis Y Sharoukhov

Aswin Raghav Nirmaleswaran

Joseph Succar

Tonislav Ivanov

Denis Babeshko

Tanaporn Na Narong

Mario Chris

Sadegh Nouri Gooshki

Fabian Hough

Kim Eric Drexler

Yuliya Seregina

Petr Boiko

Serge Faguet

George Markou

Tj Brunette

Ashwin Gopinath

Parker Musselman

Denis Sharoukhov

James Williams

Joseph R Succar

An imaging system is disclosed herein. The imaging system includes an imaging apparatus and a computing system. The imaging apparatus includes a plurality of light sources positioned at a plurality of positions and a plurality of angles relative to a stage configured to support a specimen. The imaging apparatus is configured to capture a plurality of images of a surface of the specimen. The computing system in communication with the imaging apparatus. The computing system configured to generate a 3D-reconstruction of the surface of the specimen by receiving, from the imaging apparatus, the plurality of images of the surface of the specimen, generating, by the imaging apparatus via a deep learning model, a height map of the surface of the specimen based on the plurality of images, and outputting a 3D-reconstruction of the surface of the specimen based on the height map generated by the deep learning model.

Deep photometric learning (DPL) systems, apparatus and methods

Aspects of the disclosed technology encompass the use of a deep learning controller for monitoring and improving a manufacturing process. In some aspects, a method of the disclosed technology includes steps for: receiving a plurality of control values from two or more stations, at a deep learning controller, wherein the control values are generated at the two or more stations deployed in a manufacturing process, predicting an expected value for an intermediate or final output of an article of manufacture, based on the control values, and determining if the predicted expected value for the article of manufacture is in-specification. In some aspects, the process can further include steps for generating control inputs if the predicted expected value for the article of manufacture is not in-specification. Systems and computer-readable media are also provided.

Predictive process control for a manufacturing process

Systems, methods, and media for additive manufacturing are provided. In some embodiments, an additive manufacturing system comprises: a hardware processor that is configured to: receive a captured image; apply a trained failure classifier to a low-resolution version of the captured image; determine that a non-recoverable failure is not present in the printed layer of the object; generate a cropped version of the low-resolution version of the captured image; apply a trained binary error classifier to the cropped version of the low-resolution version of the captured image; determine that an error is present in the printed layer of the object; apply a trained extrusion classifier to the captured image, wherein the trained extrusion classifier generates an extrusion quality score; and adjust a value of a parameter of the print head based on the extrusion quality score to print a subsequent layer of the printed object.

Systems, methods, and media for artificial intelligence process control in additive manufacturing

A manufacturing system is disclosed herein. The manufacturing system includes one or more stations, a monitoring platform, and a control module. Each station of the one or more stations is configured to perform at least one step in a multi-step manufacturing process for a component. The monitoring platform is configured to monitor progression of the component throughout the multi-step manufacturing process. The control module is configured to dynamically adjust processing parameters of each step of the multi-step manufacturing process to achieve a desired final quality metric for the component.

Systems, methods, and media for manufacturing processes

A fluorescence microscopy inspection system includes light sources able to emit light that causes a specimen to fluoresce and light that does not cause a specimen to fluoresce. The emitted light is directed through one or more filters and objective channels towards a specimen. A ring of lights projects light at the specimen at an oblique angle through a darkfield channel. One of the filters may modify the light to match a predetermined bandgap energy associated with the specimen and another filter may filter wavelengths of light reflected from the specimen and to a camera. The camera may produce an image from the received light and specimen classification and feature analysis may be performed on the image.

Fluorescence microscopy inspection systems, apparatus and methods with darkfield channel

A computing system generates a training data set for training the prediction model to detect defects present in a target surface of a target specimen and training the prediction model to detect defects present in the target surface of the target specimen based on the training data set. The computing system generates the training data set by identifying a set of images for training the prediction model, the set of images comprising a first subset of images. A deep learning network generates a second subset of images for subsequent labelling based on the set of images comprising the first subset of images. The deep learning network generates a third subset of images for labelling based on the set of images comprising the first subset of images and the labeled second subset of images. The computing system continues the process until a threshold number of labeled images is generated.

Defect detection system

A system including a deep learning processor obtains response data of at least two data types from a set of process stations performing operations as part of a manufacturing process. The system analyzes factory operation and control data to generate expected behavioral pattern data. Further, the system uses the response data to generate actual behavior pattern data for the process stations. Based on an analysis of the actual behavior pattern data in relation to the expected behavioral pattern data, the system determines whether anomalous activity has occurred as a result of the manufacturing process. If it is determined that anomalous activity has occurred, the system provides an indication of this anomalous activity.

Dynamic monitoring and securing of factory processes, equipment and automated systems

A computing system identifies a trajectory example generated by a human operator. The trajectory example includes trajectory information of the human operator while performing a task to be learned by a control system of the computing system. Based on the trajectory example, the computing system trains the control system to perform the task exemplified in the trajectory example. Training the control system includes generating an output trajectory of a robot performing the task. The computing system identifies an updated trajectory example generated by the human operator based on the trajectory example and the output trajectory of the robot performing the task. Based on the updated trajectory example, the computing system continues to train the control system to perform the task exemplified in the updated trajectory example.

Imitation learning in a manufacturing environment

Aspects of the disclosed technology encompass the use of a deep-learning controller for monitoring and improving a manufacturing process. In some aspects, a method of the disclosed technology includes steps for: receiving control values associated with a process station in a manufacturing process, predicting an expected value for an article of manufacture output from the process station, and determining if the deep-learning controller can control the manufacturing process based on the expected value. Systems and computer-readable media are also provided.

A manufacturing system is disclosed herein. The manufacturing system includes one or more stations, a monitoring platform, and a control module. Each station of the one or more stations is configured to perform at least one step in a multi-step manufacturing process for a component. The monitoring platform is configured to monitor progression of the component throughout the multi-step manufacturing process. The control module is configured to detect a cyberattack to the manufacturing system. The control module is configured to perform operations. The operations include receiving control values for a first station of the one or more stations. The operations further include determining that there is a cyberattack based on the control values for the first station using one or more machine learning algorithms. The operations further include generating an alert to cease processing of the component. In some embodiments, the operations further include correcting errors caused by the cyberattack.

Securing industrial production from sophisticated attacks

Aspects of the disclosed technology provide a computational model that utilizes machine learning for detecting errors during a manual assembly process and determining a sequence of steps to complete the manual assembly process in order to mitigate the detected errors. In some implementations, the disclosed technology evaluates a target object at a step of an assembly process where an error is detected to a nominal object to obtain a comparison. Based on this comparison, a sequence of steps for completion of the assembly process of the target object is obtained. The assembly instructions for creating the target object are adjusted based on this sequence of steps.

Growing community of inventors

Wayne, NJ, United States of America

Vadim Pinskiy