Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation

Thomas F Landers

Kevin Prosser

Abhishek Vaidya

Alborz Sakhaei

Blake Finlayson

Thomas Horne

John R Mayo

Scott Buethe

Michael Malluck

Robert Hartley

Francois Hugon

Alex Rummel

Thomas P Lavrisa

Suzanne Swaine

A method of checking accuracy of an air data probe system onboard a vehicle is disclosed. An embodiment of the method involves: calculating airspeed measurements from air data provided by the probe system; calculating vehicle speed measurements based on sensor data collected from at least one sensor system onboard the vehicle, wherein the vehicle speed measurements are distinct and independent of the airspeed measurements, and the vehicle speed measurements are calculated without using the air data; comparing a calculated airspeed measurement against a calculated vehicle speed measurement to obtain a speed difference, wherein the calculated airspeed measurement and the calculated vehicle speed measurement correspond to a measurement time during which the vehicle is moving forward; and initiating at least one corrective action onboard the vehicle when magnitude of the speed difference exceeds a threshold value.

Accuracy check methodology for an air data probe system

A projected recovery trajectory for an aircraft autopilot system is precomputed by providing a stored set of predefined recovery mode segments, including: a mode 1 segment that models the aircraft coasting; a mode 2 segment that models the aircraft executing a nose high recovery; a mode 3 segment that models the aircraft executing a nose low recovery; a mode 4 segment that models the aircraft executing a throttle only recovery; and a mode 5 segment that models the aircraft executing a terrain avoidance recovery. A processor generates at least one projected recovery trajectory based on a current state of the aircraft, where the processor selectively concatenates selected ones of the predefined recovery mode segments into a sequence and uses that sequence to generate the projected trajectory.

Piecewise recovery system

The aircraft threat envelope protection system employs a threat envelope data structure in a computer-readable medium that stores at least one trigger condition for each of a plurality of different types of threats associated with the aircraft, and modeled using a common schema. A processor computes plural different projected trajectories representing different possible aircraft paths through spacetime. The processor associates at least some of the plurality of the threats to specific trigger points in spacetime along each of the projected trajectories. The processor will deprecate ones of the projected trajectories when they are deemed not viable to recover from a threat. The processor initiates an aircraft protective response when all projected trajectories but one have been deprecated and the aircraft is within a predetermined proximity to the closest trigger point in spacetime along the non-deprecated trajectory.

Predictive aircraft flight envelope protection system

An aircraft includes a brake lever for receiving a pilot braking input as a lever travel of the brake lever, a braking wheel operatively coupled with the brake lever to brake the aircraft based on the lever travel, a brake actuator operatively coupled with the braking wheel to apply a braking force in response to a braking pressure provided to the brake actuator, and a brake pressure circuit. The brake pressure circuit is configured for: estimating a maximum braking pressure above which the braking wheel will skid with respect to a ground surface; scaling a lever gain of the brake lever to command the maximum braking pressure at a full travel of the brake lever such that a remaining brake lever travel indicates the amount of braking capability remaining for the aircraft; and braking the braking wheel based on the lever gain and the lever travel.

Vehicle brake pedal travel based on braking force available between braking wheels and ground

An aircraft includes a first landing gear assembly, a second landing gear assembly, a braking circuit, a brake control circuit, and a braking capability circuit. The landing gear assemblies each include a first braking wheel and a second braking wheel. The braking circuit may apply brakes independently to each of the braking wheels. The brake control circuit actuates braking of the first braking wheels in response to initial receipt of a braking command in a first braking phase and restrict braking at the second braking wheels during the first braking phase until the first braking wheels reach an anti-skid limit at an end of the first braking phase. The braking capability circuit determines a braking capability of the aircraft based on an amount of braking applied to reach the anti-skid limit at the first braking wheels.

Vehicle braking capability determination by braking with fewer than all available braking wheels

The processor supplies flight commands to the flight control system by selectively blending pilot input with control signals from the autopilot. The processor generates a projected recovery trajectory through successive iterations, each beginning at the current aircraft location and using a recovery constraint selectable by the processor to influences a degree of flight aggressiveness. A detection system that identifies and invokes a state of threat existence if a threat exists along the projected recovery trajectory. The processor during threat existence in a first iteration commands an initial soft recovery, with permitted blended pilot input. If the threat exists on subsequent iteration, the processor commands a more aggressive recovery while attenuating blended pilot input.

Non-binary collaborative recovery system

The aircraft take-off awareness system predicts and informs the pilot about where on the runway certain safety speeds will be achieved. A processor coupled to receive inertial data from the aircraft computes an aircraft weight estimate based at least in part upon the inertial data. The processor then computes a future acceleration prediction based on the computed aircraft weight estimate. Using the future acceleration prediction, the processor then computes the position of various warning reference distances corresponding to predicted positions on the runway at which said certain safety speeds will be achieved. The processor generates a display that it dynamically updates as the reference distances change as the aircraft proceeds down the runway during take-off or aborted take-off.

Take-off performance prediction and alerting system

An aircraft includes a processor, an airframe, a pitch attitude flight control surface coupled with the airframe, a nose wheel coupled with the airframe, main wheels coupled with the airframe, and a brake system coupled with the main wheels. The processor is programmed to determine that the aircraft has entered a braking segment of a landing phase of a flight of the aircraft while the aircraft is on a ground surface and to command the pitch attitude flight control surface with a nose up command during the braking segment in response to determining that the aircraft has entered the braking segment. The nose up command causes the pitch attitude flight control surface to generate a downforce that increases traction between the main wheels and the ground surface due to a weight shift from the nose wheel to the main wheels and directly due to the downforce on the main wheels.

Aircraft landing with elevator down force assistance during braking

Aircraft, auto speed brake control systems, and methods for controlling drag of an aircraft are provided. In one example, an aircraft includes an aircraft structure. A drag device is operatively coupled to the aircraft structure between a stowed and a deployed position and/or an intermediate deployed position. A speed brake controller is in communication with the drag device to control movement. An autothrottle-autospeedbrake controller is in communication with the speed brake controller and is configured to receive data signals. The autothrottle-autospeedbrake controller is operative to direct the speed brake controller to control movement of the drag device between the stowed position and the deployed position and/or the intermediate deployed position in response to at least one of the data signals.

Integrated thrust and drag control of an aircraft

Avionics systems, aircraft, and methods are provided. An avionics system for a subject aircraft includes an intruder aircraft detection device and a processor. The processor is programmed to: identify an intruder aircraft using the intruder aircraft detection device; predict a future path of the intruder aircraft; estimate strength, size, and location characteristics of a wake vortex created by the intruder aircraft at future points in time along the future path; calculate a potential trajectory with potential positions of the subject aircraft at each of the future points in time; compare the potential positions with the strength, size, and location characteristics of the wake vortex at each of the future points in time to identify a wake conflict; and maneuver the subject aircraft based on the wake conflict.

Avoidance of aircraft and aircraft wake during flight

Aircraft, control-by-wire systems, and controllers are provided. The aircraft includes a flight control surface and a control-by-wire system. The control-by-wire system includes an input device and a controller. The input device is configured to control the flight control surface. The controller is communicatively coupled with the input device and configured to automatically offset a neutral force position of the input device based on a deviation of the aircraft from a reference condition while the aircraft is operated in a manual flight mode.

Systems for inceptor control in fly-by-wire aircraft systems

Disclosed is a runway alerting method and system for an aircraft performing a landing maneuver. During the landing maneuver, a minimum stopping position and a maximum stopping position for the aircraft along the runway is determined using aircraft energy state, deceleration and braking information. The minimum stopping position is based upon the aircraft performing a maximum flare maneuver prior to touchdown on the runway and the maximum stopping position is based upon the aircraft performing a minimum flare maneuver prior to touchdown on the runway. The minimum and maximum stopping positions are presented to the aircraft pilot on a display to assist the pilot in safely landing the aircraft.

Runway overrun monitor

Disclosed is a runway alerting method and system for an aircraft during a take-off maneuver. The method includes determining stopping positions for the aircraft along the runway using aircraft energy state, deceleration and braking information and displaying the stopping positions on a display.

Growing community of inventors

Savannah, GA, United States of America

Thomas F Landers