Google Inc.

International Business Machines Corporation

Nuance Communications, Inc.

Tara N Sainath

Dimitri Kanevsky

Sasha P Caskey

Bo Li

Rohit Prakash Prabhavalkar

Ron J Weiss

Ruoming Pang

Trevor D Strohman

Yonghui Wu

Bhuvana Ramabhadran

Sara H Basson

Kevin William Wilson

David Nahamoo

Michiel A U Bacchiani

Arun Narayanan

Chung-Cheng Chiu

Ehsan Variani

Yanzhang He

Sameer Maskey

Zhifeng Chen

Aleksandr Y Aravkin

Patrick An Phu Nguyen

James R Kozloski

Peter Kenneth Malkin

Golan Pundak

David Rybach

Ke Hu

Clifford A Pickover

Robert G Farrell

Anjuli Patricia Kannan

Rami Botros

Rick A Hamilton, Ii

Ossama S Emam

Brian E D Kingsbury

Maria Carolina Parada San Martin

Antoine Jean Bruguier

Dan Jiang

Jiahui Yu

Shuo-Yiin Chang

Andrew William Senior

Khe Chai Sim

Qiao Liang

Weiran Wang

Yangzhang He

Pedro Jose Moreno Mengibar

Lior Horesh

Michael Alan Picheny

Anirban Basu

Eugene Weinstein

Samuel Bengio

Vikas Sindhwani

Izhak Shafran

Anmol Gulati

Cyril Allauzen

Rick Hamilton

Christopher Walter George Thornton

Charles Caleb Peyser

Ronny Huang

Hariklia Deligianni

Pamela Ann Nesbitt

Oriol Vinyals

Yu Zhang

Hasim Sak

Rajeev Conrad Nongpiur

Navdeep Jaitly

George Andrei Saon

Sachin Gupta

Elizabeth Vera Woodward

Marc Yvon

Kanury Kanishka Rao

Gabor Simko

Wei Li

Wilfredo Ferre

Chanwoo Kim

Ankur Bapna

Wei Han

Basilio Garcia Castillo

Guoguo Chen

Ian Mcgraw

Mirkó Visontai

Wei Ping Li

Carlos Henrique Cardonha

Vaibhava Goel

Etienne Marcheret

Diamantino Antonio Caseiro

Ian C McGraw

Neeraj Gaur

Parisa Haghani

Shankar Kumar

Vijayaditya Peddinti

Petr Fousek

Guru Prakash Arumugam

Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski

Tongzhou Chen

Andrew W Senior

Qiumin Xu

Manaal Faruqui

Liangliang Cao

Shaojin Ding

David Qiu

A method includes receiving context biasing data that includes a set of unspoken textual utterances corresponding to a particular context. The method also includes obtaining a list of carrier phrases associated with the particular context. For each respective unspoken textual utterance, the method includes generating a corresponding training data pair that includes the respective unspoken textual utterance and a carrier phrase. For each respective training data pair, the method includes tokenizing the respective training data pair into a sequence of sub-word units, generating a first higher order textual feature representation for a corresponding sub-word unit, receiving the first higher order textual feature representation, and generating a first probability distribution over possible text units. The method also includes training a speech recognition model based on the first probability distribution over possible text units.

Contextual biasing with text injection

Systems and methods of the present disclosure are directed to a computing system, including one or more processors and a machine-learned multi-mode speech recognition model configured to operate in a streaming recognition mode or a contextual recognition mode. The computing system can perform operations including obtaining speech data and a ground truth label and processing the speech data using the contextual recognition mode to obtain contextual prediction data. The operations can include evaluating a difference between the contextual prediction data and the ground truth label and processing the speech data using the streaming recognition mode to obtain streaming prediction data. The operations can include evaluating a difference between the streaming prediction data and the ground truth label and the contextual and streaming prediction data. The operations can include adjusting parameters of the speech recognition model.

Systems and methods for training dual-mode machine-learned speech recognition models

Two-pass automatic speech recognition (ASR) models can be used to perform streaming on-device ASR to generate a text representation of an utterance captured in audio data. Various implementations include a first-pass portion of the ASR model used to generate streaming candidate recognition(s) of an utterance captured in audio data. For example, the first-pass portion can include a recurrent neural network transformer (RNN-T) decoder. Various implementations include a second-pass portion of the ASR model used to revise the streaming candidate recognition(s) of the utterance and generate a text representation of the utterance. For example, the second-pass portion can include a listen attend spell (LAS) decoder. Various implementations include a shared encoder shared between the RNN-T decoder and the LAS decoder.

Two-pass end to end speech recognition

A method of training a language model for rare-word speech recognition includes obtaining a set of training text samples, and obtaining a set of training utterances used for training a speech recognition model. Each training utterance in the plurality of training utterances includes audio data corresponding to an utterance and a corresponding transcription of the utterance. The method also includes applying rare word filtering on the set of training text samples to identify a subset of rare-word training text samples that include words that do not appear in the transcriptions from the set of training utterances or appear in the transcriptions from the set of training utterances less than a threshold number of times. The method further includes training the external language model on the transcriptions from the set of training utterances and the identified subset of rare-word training text samples.

Large-scale language model data selection for rare-word speech recognition

An automated speech recognition (ASR) model includes a first encoder, a first encoder, a second encoder, and a second decoder. The first encoder receives, as input, a sequence of acoustic frames, and generates, at each of a plurality of output steps, a first higher order feature representation for a corresponding acoustic frame in the sequence of acoustic frames. The first decoder receives, as input, the first higher order feature representation generated by the first encoder, and generates a first probability distribution over possible speech recognition hypotheses. The second encoder receives, as input, the first higher order feature representation generated by the first encoder, and generates a second higher order feature representation for a corresponding first higher order feature frame. The second decoder receives, as input, the second higher order feature representation generated by the second encoder, and generates a second probability distribution over possible speech recognition hypotheses.

Unified cascaded encoder ASR model for dynamic model sizes

A computer-implemented method includes receiving audio data that corresponds to an utterance spoken by a user and captured by a user device. The method also includes processing the audio data to determine a candidate transcription that includes a sequence of tokens for the spoken utterance. Tor each token in the sequence of tokens, the method includes determining a token embedding for corresponding token, determining a n-gram token embedding for a previous sequence of n-gram tokens, and concatenating the token embedding and the n-gram token embedding to generate a concatenated output for the corresponding token. The method also includes rescoring the candidate transcription for the spoken utterance by processing the concatenated output generated for each corresponding token in the sequence of tokens.

Lookup-table recurrent language model

A method includes receiving a training example that includes audio data representing a spoken utterance and a ground truth transcription. For each word in the spoken utterance, the method also includes inserting a placeholder symbol before the respective word identifying a respective ground truth alignment for a beginning and an end of the respective word, determining a beginning word piece and an ending word piece, and generating a first constrained alignment for the beginning word piece and a second constrained alignment for the ending word piece. The first constrained alignment is aligned with the ground truth alignment for the beginning of the respective word and the second constrained alignment is aligned with the ground truth alignment for the ending of the respective word. The method also includes constraining an attention head of a second pass decoder by applying the first and second constrained alignments.

Emitting word timings with end-to-end models

A method of text-only and semi-supervised training for deliberation includes receiving training data including unspoken textual utterances that are each not paired with any corresponding spoken utterance of non-synthetic speech, and training a deliberation model that includes a text encoder and a deliberation decoder on the unspoken textual utterances. The method also includes receiving, at the trained deliberation model, first-pass hypotheses and non-causal acoustic embeddings. The first-pass hypotheses is generated by a recurrent neural network-transducer (RNN-T) decoder for the non-causal acoustic embeddings encoded by a non-causal encoder. The method also includes encoding, using the text encoder, the first-pass hypotheses generated by the RNN-T decoder, and generating, using the deliberation decoder attending to both the first-pass hypotheses and the non-causal acoustic embeddings, second-pass hypotheses.

Deliberation by text-only and semi-supervised training

A method includes generating, using an audio encoder, a higher-order feature representation for each acoustic frame in a sequence of acoustic frames; generating, using a decoder, based on the higher-order feature representation, a plurality of speech recognition hypotheses, each hypotheses corresponding to a candidate transcription of an utterance and having an associated first likelihood score; generating, using an external language model, for each speech recognition hypothesis, a second likelihood score; determining, using a learnable fusion module, for each speech recognition hypothesis, a set of fusion weights based on the higher-order feature representation and the speech recognition hypothesis; and generating, using the learnable fusion module, for each speech recognition hypothesis, a third likelihood score based on the first likelihood score, the second likelihood score, and the set of fusion weights, the audio encoder and decoder trained using minimum additive error rate training in the presence of the external language model.

Rare word recognition with LM-aware MWER training

A method includes receiving a sequence of input audio frames corresponding to an utterance captured by a user device, the utterance including a plurality of words. For each input audio frame, the method includes predicting, using a word boundary detection model configured receive the sequence of input audio frames as input, whether the input audio frame is a word boundary. The method includes batching the input audio frames into a plurality of batches based on the input audio frames predicted as word boundaries, wherein each batch includes a corresponding plurality of batched input audio frames. For each of the plurality of batches, the method includes processing, using a speech recognition model, the corresponding plurality of batched input audio frames in parallel to generate a speech recognition result.

Predicting word boundaries for on-device batching of end-to-end speech recognition models

A method includes receiving, as input to a speech recognition model, audio data corresponding to a spoken utterance. The method also includes performing, using the speech recognition model, speech recognition on the audio data by, at each of a plurality of time steps, encoding, using an audio encoder, the audio data corresponding to the spoken utterance into a corresponding audio encoding, and decoding, using a speech recognition joint network, the corresponding audio encoding into a probability distribution over possible output labels. At each of the plurality of time steps, the method also includes determining, using an intended query (IQ) joint network configured to receive a label history representation associated with a sequence of non-blank symbols output by a final softmax layer, an intended query decision indicating whether or not the spoken utterance includes a query intended for a digital assistant.

Intended query detection using E2E modeling for continued conversation

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer-readable media, for speech recognition using multi-dialect and multilingual models. In some implementations, audio data indicating audio characteristics of an utterance is received. Input features determined based on the audio data are provided to a speech recognition model that has been trained to output score indicating the likelihood of linguistic units for each of multiple different language or dialects. The speech recognition model can be one that has been trained using cluster adaptive training. Output that the speech recognition model generated in response to receiving the input features determined based on the audio data is received. A transcription of the utterance generated based on the output of the speech recognition model is provided.

Multi-dialect and multilingual speech recognition

A method includes receiving audio features and generating a latent speech representation based on the audio features. The method also includes generating a target quantized vector token and a target token index for a corresponding latent speech representation. The method also includes generating a contrastive context vector for a corresponding unmasked or masked latent speech representation and deriving a contrastive self-supervised loss based on the corresponding contrastive context vector and the corresponding target quantized vector token. The method also include generating a high-level context vector based on the contrastive context vector and, for each high-level context vector, learning to predict the target token index at the corresponding time step using a cross-entropy loss based on the target token index. The method also includes predicting speech recognition hypotheses for the utterance and training a multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) model using an unsupervised loss and a supervised loss.

Joint unsupervised and supervised training for multilingual ASR

A speech recognition model includes an encoder network, a prediction network, and a joint network. The encoder network is configured to receive a sequence of acoustic frames characterizing an input utterance; and generate, at each of a plurality of output steps, a higher order feature representation for a corresponding acoustic frame in the sequence of acoustic frames. The prediction network is configured to: receive a sequence of non-blank symbols output by a final Softmax layer; and generate, at each of the plurality of output steps, a dense representation. The joint network is configured to generate, at each of the plurality of output steps based on the higher order feature representation and the dense representation, a probability distribution over possible speech recognition hypotheses. The joint network includes a stack of gating and bilinear pooling to fuse the dense representation and the higher order feature representation.

Fusion of acoustic and text representations in RNN-T

A computer-implemented method includes receiving a sequence of acoustic frames as input to an automatic speech recognition (ASR) model. Here, the ASR model includes a causal encoder and a decoder. The method also includes generating, by the causal encoder, a first higher order feature representation for a corresponding acoustic frame in the sequence of acoustic frames. The method also includes generating, by the decoder, a first probability distribution over possible speech recognition hypotheses. Here, the causal encoder includes a stack of causal encoder layers each including a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Attention-Performer module that applies linear attention.

Optimizing inference performance for conformer

Growing community of inventors

New York, NY, United States of America

Tara N Sainath