Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC

Suresh Tharamal

Alan Aitken Ramaley

Thomas W Olsen

Sean Erik McAteer

Valerie D Serdy

Noah Benjamin Edelstein

Michael H Ammerlaan

John Keith Bankston

Aruna Somendra

Lakshmana Venkata Vihari Putta

Sriravi Kotagiri

A computer system is provided, including a first data storage with a first retrieval latency, a second data storage with a second retrieval latency that is higher than the first retrieval latency, and a processor coupled to a memory that stores instructions, which cause the processor to store a series of recovery points of a data collection in the first data storage. For a current recovery point of the series of recovery points, the processor is further configured to compute a difference between an incremental changed block value of one or more prior recovery points and a number of memory blocks inherited from the one or more prior recovery points. The processor generates and outputs a storage transfer recommendation to store a subset of the one or more of the prior recovery points in the second data storage rather than the first data storage, based on the computed difference.

Computer system with data storage transfer recommendation

A system and method is provided that centrally stores in a server farm custom jobs defined by developers or administrators of the server farm. The system and method enables the server farm to automatically distribute the jobs to servers in the server farm and to execute the jobs according to parameters defined for the jobs.

Extensible and distributed job execution service in a server farm

A system and method for reviewing an electronic document. A copy of an electronic document is sent to a reviewer, the copy of the electronic document having a first property identifying the location of the electronic document in the memory and indicating that review of the copy has been requested. The reviewer uses an application program to open the copy of the electronic document. The application program detects properties and in response to the first property, automatically displays a review toolbar. The edited electronic document is then sent back to the author having at least a first property. The application program executed by the author detects the properties and in response to the first property, retrieves the original electronic document from the memory and automatically prompts the author to merge the edited electronic document into the electronic document.

Reviewing and merging electronic documents

An automated review cycle automatically merges changes in a reviewed document into an original document and by provides reviewing tools on a context-sensitive basis. The automated review cycle can operate within the environments of a document management system, a link-based document collaboration system (e.g., common server), or an attachment-based collaboration system. By generating a review cycle identification number (RCID) and by maintaining other information about the review cycle in a configuration file, an original author and a reviewer of a document can be distinguished and can be provided the appropriate prompts and tools to facilitate the document review process.

Automating a document review cycle

A desktop application program provides a single entry point for indicating that a file is to be sent to a recipient. In response to an indication that the file is to be sent, a determination is automatically made as to whether the file should be sent as a link, as an attachment, or as both a link and an attachment. If the file has not been saved to a disk location or if the file has not been saved to a shared disk location, the file is sent as an attachment to an e-mail note. If the file has been saved to a shared disk location, the file is sent to the recipient as a link in an e-mail note. In order to determine if the file saved to the shared disk location should also be sent as an attachment, a registry is checked for a send preference regarding shared files. If a send preference indicates that shared files are to be sent as attachments, the file is sent as both a link and an attachment. If a send preference indicates that shared files are not to be sent as attachment, the file is sent only as a link. If the sender has not previously indicated a send preference, the sender may be prompted to input a signal indicating whether the file is to be sent as an attachment. A send preference may be created in response to the signal, if the sender so desires.

Growing community of inventors

Sammamish, WA, United States of America

Suresh Tharamal