International Business Machines Corporation

Trustwave Holdings Inc

Steven Ocepek

Johnny A Shaieb

Jason Allan Nikolai

Muhammed Fatih Bulut

Constantin Mircea Adam

Nevenko Zunic

Sai Zeng

Milton H Hernandez

Tamer Aboualy

Robert Maier

Jason Bornheimer

Michael Redford

Lilian Mathias Ngweta

Daby Mousse Sow

Robert Filepp

Srinivas Babu Tummalapenta

Daniel S Riley

Abdulhamid Adebowale Adebayo

Ting Dai

Christopher Bedell

Seth Grey Glasgow

Wendel Guglielmetti Henrique

Muhammed Faith Bulut

One or more systems, devices, computer program products and/or computer-implemented methods provided herein relate to prioritization of attack techniques and cyber security events. According to an embodiment, an attack prioritization engine can receive security events, train an artificial intelligence model to rank respective cyber security events as a function of risk, and output a prioritization of security events to address. A mapping component can map asset vulnerabilities to attack techniques. A calculation component can calculate and aggregate scores for respective attack techniques. An attack surface component can extract features from the aggregation of scores to rank attack techniques and determine an attack surface. The mapping component can further map security events to the attack techniques.

Prioritization of attack techniques against an organization

An apparatus, a method, and a computer program product are provided that combine policy compliance with vulnerability management to provide a more accurate risk assessment of an environment. The method includes training a policy machine learning model using a first training dataset to generate a policy machine learning model to produce mitigation technique classifications and training a vulnerability machine learning model using a second training dataset to generate a vulnerability machine learning model to produce weakness type classifications. The method also includes mapping the mitigation technique classifications to attack techniques to produce a policy mapping and mapping the weakness type classifications to the attack techniques to produce a vulnerability mapping. The method further includes producing a risk assessment of a vulnerability based on the policy mapping and the vulnerability mapping.

Combining policy compliance and vulnerability management for risk assessment

A computer-implemented method for prioritizing exclusion renewal records is disclosed. The computer-implemented method includes determining vulnerability factors associated with a vulnerability exclusion record. The computer-implemented method further includes generating a vulnerability factor score for each vulnerability factor associated with the vulnerability exclusion record based, at least in part, on a level of risk associated with the vulnerability factor. The computer-implemented method further includes generating a vulnerability score for the vulnerability exclusion record based, at least in part, on the vulnerability factor score for each vulnerability factor. The computer-implemented method further includes updating a previous vulnerability score of the vulnerability exclusion record.

Dynamic prioritization of vulnerability exclusion renewals

The subject matter herein provides an automated system and method for software patch management that ranks patches at least in part according to a score indicative of a complexity (e.g., cost) of remediating a vulnerability. This score is sometimes referred to herein as a vulnerability remediation complexity (VRC) score. A VRC score provides an objective measure by which an organization can determine which patches are most likely to be successfully applied, thus enabling implementation of a patching strategy that preferentially applies most critical, but less impact (in terms of remediation cost) patches first to remediate as must risk as possible as quickly as possible. Thus, for example, the approach herein enables the patching to focus on vulnerabilities of highest severity and small remediation cost over those, for example, representing lower severity and higher remediation cost.

Vulnerability remediation complexity (VRC) system

Systems and techniques that facilitate automated health-check risk assessment of computing assets are provided that can generate a baseline health-check risk score that corresponds to non-compliance of a computing asset with a stipulated control, and can adjust the baseline health-check risk score based on a weakness factor of the stipulated control, an environmental factor of the computing asset, a criticality factor of the computing asset, and a maturity factor of the computing asset.

Automated health-check risk assessment of computing assets

Systems, computer-implemented methods, and computer program products that facilitate vulnerability and attack technique association are provided. According to an embodiment, a system can comprise a memory that stores computer executable components and a processor that executes the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components can comprise a map component that defines mappings between vulnerability data representing a vulnerability of a computing resource and attack data representing at least one attack technique. The computer executable components can further comprise an estimation component that analyzes the mappings to estimate a probability that the vulnerability will be exploited to attack the computing resource.

Vulnerability and attack technique association

Prioritizing vulnerability scan results is provided. Vulnerability scan results data corresponding to a network of data processing systems are received from a vulnerability scanner. The vulnerability scan results data are parsed to group the vulnerability scan results data by vulnerability identifiers. A corresponding security threat information identifier is associated with each vulnerability identifier. A correlation of each associated security threat information identifier is performed with a set of current vulnerability exploit data that corresponds to that particular security threat information identifier. Current security threat information that affects host data processing systems in the network is determined based on the correlation between each associated security threat information identifier and its corresponding set of current vulnerability exploit data. The current security threat information is prioritized based on a number of corresponding current vulnerability exploit attacks.

Prioritizing vulnerability scan results

A method, apparatus, system, and computer program product for operating a portable security testing device. The portable security testing device is configured by computer system with an operating system and a starting set of security testing tools. A selected set of the security testing tools is determined by the computer system for the portable security testing device based on information collected about a target by the portable security testing device. The starting set of the security testing tools in the portable security testing device is changed by the computer system to form a current set of the security testing tools in response to the starting set of the security testing tools being different from the selected set of the security testing tools, wherein the current set of the security testing tools operate to perform security tests on the target.

Portable security testing device

Systems and methods for determining vulnerability to session stealing are disclosed. An example method includes intercepting, at a first computing device, an intercepted packet sent from a client to a second computing device different than the first computing device, the intercepted packet including a first instruction in a first portion of the intercepted packet, determining, using a template, a second portion of the intercepted packet that is a value that is changed by a calculated amount each time that the client sends a packet, changing the value by the calculated amount to determine a next value for a next packet, replacing the second portion of the intercepted packet with the next value to generate a modified packet, replacing the first portion of the modified packet with a second instruction, and transmitting the modified packet to the second computing device.

Growing community of inventors

Cuyahoga Falls, OH, United States of America

Steven Ocepek