Sap Se

Shanavas Madeen S

Ravikanth Malipeddu

Naveen V

Win Acharya

Santhosh Reddy Mereddy

Prabhat Kumar Singh

Sushanth B R

Havva Mehfooz

Rakhi Mishra

Lindsay Russell

Sandeep Negi

Manu Jose Philip

Ajith G

Tacye Huegel

Anurag Nayak

According to some embodiments, systems and methods are provided, including at least one end-to-end (E2E) scenario including a sequence of process steps; a plurality of automates, wherein an automate is executable for each process step; a memory storing processor-executable code; and a processing unit to execute the processor-executable program code to: execute the plurality of automates in a sequential order that matches a sequential order of the process steps; for each executed automate, determine whether the executed automate failed; in a case it is determined the executed automate failed, identify dependent transactional data input to the failed automate, wherein the dependent transactional data includes one or more data objects; identify a validity state of each data object; and resume execution of the process steps based on the identified validity state. Numerous other aspects are provided.

Resume of failed automates in end-to-end process

According to some embodiments, systems and methods are provided including a memory storing program code to: execute a functional automation tool for an application under test in at least two languages, wherein execution of the functional automation tool includes a rendering of a plurality of user interfaces in each of the at least two languages; identify at least one of a label and a tooltip in each of the plurality of user interfaces; capture a screenshot for each of the plurality of user interfaces, wherein the captured screenshots include a first screenshot and at least one subsequent screenshot; identify the subsequent screenshot as unique or redundant; and render a language acceptance testing output for each unique screenshot, displaying each identified label and tooltip in the at least two languages. Numerous other aspects are provided.

Plug and play language acceptance testing

Provided are systems and methods for automated language testing for use in continuous integration and continuous delivery software development. In one example, the method may include identifying language tests in a plurality of different natural languages to be performed for a software application, executing the language tests and validating the language tests based on results of executed scripts, automatically assigning the language tests among a plurality of language testers based on execution of a machine learning model which pairs together a language test with a language tester based on test attributes and tester attributes, and transmitting notifications to computing devices of the plurality of language testers with information about the automatically assigned language tests.

AI-based language testing process for CI/CD

According to some embodiments, systems and methods are provided, including a memory storing processor-executable code; and a processing unit to execute the executable program code to: execute an automation test for a user interface application, wherein execution of the automation test includes accessing a web-object; determine whether the web-object is included in an object repository; in a case it is determined the web-object is not included in the object repository, create the web-object in the object repository; and in a case it is determined the web-object is included in the object repository: determine whether the accessed web-object includes at least one different property from the web-object included in the object repository; and update the web-object included in the object repository with the at least one different property in the accessed web-object. Numerous other aspects are provided.

Re-usable web-objects for use with automation tools

A method of intelligent accessibility testing includes generating a test case including a plurality of tests, for an application, to test, for the application, compliance with a plurality of accessibility requirements. The method includes generating a plurality of objects. The method includes executing, during generation of the plurality of objects, a first test of the plurality of tests to determine compliance with a first accessibility requirement of the plurality of accessibility requirements. The method includes executing, based at least on the plurality of objects, a second test of the plurality of tests to determine compliance with a second accessibility requirement of the plurality of accessibility requirements. The method includes providing, based on execution of the first test and the second test, a status of the first test and/or the second test indicating the compliance with the plurality of accessibility requirements. Related systems and articles of manufacture are provided.

Intelligent accessibility testing

Growing community of inventors

Karnataka, India

Shanavas Madeen S