Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC

Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC

Samuel Ng

Prashant Dwarkadas Agrawal

Jake Carver Swenson

Raja Krishnaswamy

Patrick Nelson

Mads Torgersen

Gregg Bernard Miskelly

Michael Shneerson

James J Hugunin

Robert Alan Paveza

Timothy Ng

Milan Gada

Christopher Joseph Burrows

Gearard Boland

Anders Hejlsberg

Matthew J Warren

Avner Y Aharoni

Rajesh Hegde

Brian James Walker

Aleksey V Tsingauz

Neal M Gafter

Anton Kucer

Shrikrishna Vijaykumar Borde

Lucian Wischik

Robert Eric Lippert

John Deutscher

Rodrigo Maialle Bomfim

John F Lam

Kevin Wagner Halverson

Alex Christopher Turner

Martin Maly

Prasanna Kudli

Edward T Maurer

Scheduling job request submitted by multiple tenants in a manner that honors multiple software license agreements for the multiple tenants. A queue persistently stores job requests that await scheduling. A job state tracking component persistently tracks a state of the job requests, and perhaps provides job requests into the queue. A software license agreement enforcer reviews the job requests in the queue, selects one or more job requests should be scheduled next based on the license agreements, and provide the selected job requests to a resource manager. A subscriber/publisher pool may be used to the various components to communicate. This decouples the communication from being a simple one-to-one correspondence, but instead allows communication from a component of one type to a component of the other type, whichever instance of those components happens to be operating.

Multi-tenant license enforcement across job requests

A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Bi-directional authentication between a media repository and a hosting provider

Hosting provider hosting routes from a media repository

Embodiments are directed to providing an extensible platform that allows users to select from and implement different types of media processors and to providing a management portal that allows users to manage their media processors. In one scenario, a computer system receives from a user a workflow with various tasks that are to be processed using a user-specified media processor. The computer system schedules computer system resources including a virtual machine on which the user-specified media processor is to be installed. The user-specified media processor includes a corresponding media processor installer. The computer system instantiates the scheduled virtual machine on the computer system, initiates the media processor installer to install the user-specified media processor on the instantiated virtual machine, and implements the installed media processor on the instantiated virtual machine to process the workflow tasks.

Cloud based media processing workflows and module updating

Embodiments are directed to interacting with a server in a read-eval-print loop (REPL) environment. In an embodiment, a client computer system receives a proxy object from a remotely-hosted server. The server maintains an execution context with which the client computer system interacts. The client system presents the received proxy object to the user for interaction with the object. The user input indicates how the data in the proxy object is to be processed. The interaction allows the user to manipulate the remotely-hosted data through the local computer system. The client system then, based on the user interaction, sends a user-initiated command to the remotely-hosted server using the proxy object. The user-initiated command indicates various portions of data hosted on the server that are to be returned to the user. The data received from the remotely-hosted server is then displayed at the client computer system.

Remotely-hosted interactive client-server session

Just My Code debugging allows developers to work on problems within their own code without noise from libraries, plugins and other unrelated code. Typical debugger behaviors may be modified based upon the identification or characterization of JavaScript code as 'My Code,' 'Library Code,' or &#x201c;Unrelated Code.&#x201d; The debugger behaviors that may be modified depending upon the code's characterization include, for example, first-chance exception handling, unhandled exception handling, the behavior of the debugger at explicit user breakpoints, the behavior when a user directs the debugger to break upon the next statement, and the behavior of the debugger when the user executes a stepping gesture. The debugger's visualizes core elements of the program state, such as the call stack, depending upon the identification or characterization of the code.

Exception and debugging behaviors for JavaScript debugging using just my code

A system and method for facilitating execution of multiple assemblies in a framework, in which the assemblies use a component external to the framework, is provided. A runtime manager may retrieve metadata from each of the assemblies, and selectively insert the metadata into a unified types object, so that metadata corresponding to equivalent type definitions is shared. When each assembly is executed, the combined metadata may be used to invoke or otherwise interact with the external component.

Unified metadata for external components

Just My Code debugging allows developers to work on problems within their own code without noise from libraries, plugins and other unrelated code. Typical debugger behaviors may be modified based upon the identification or characterization of JavaScript code as 'My Code,' 'Library Code,' or &#x201c;Unrelated Code.&#x201d; The debugger behaviors that may be automatically determined using heuristics or set using a code-characterization file provided by a host application. The debugger receives project file information from the host application via a debugger-host interface. The debugger applies code-designation heuristics to undesignated code segments. If a code characterization file is received with the project information, the debugger designates application code segments based upon definitions in the code-characterization file. Once the debugger has characterized the code segments, it performs debugging operations on the application code. The behavior of the debugging operations may be selected depending upon the designation of the application code segments.

Classification of JavaScript code for debugging using just my code

Embodiments provide an abstraction on top of virtual machine allocation APIs to expose scalable services. The services are higher level components that expose a particular set of functionalities. A deployment manager handles matching and managing virtual machine allocations in order to meet the customer demands for the managed services. A deployment service exposes a 'service' as a unit of resource allocation in a distributed computing environment or cloud computing service. Client components interact with the deployment service to request new service instances to meet customer demand.

Scalable services deployment

A static type, called 'dynamic', is introduced into a statically bound programming language. An expression or subexpression that is defined as a static type called 'dynamic' in the source code of a program written in the statically bound programming language, is bound based on its runtime type instead of on its compile time type. Binding can be performed based on a mixture of compile time and runtime types that are based on the specification of types of expressions in source code. This type of binding is called hybrid binding. Operations are bound using the runtime type of constituent expressions (i.e., the runtime type of a receiver, an argument, or an operand) typed as dynamic and the compile time type of static constituents. If any constituent expression of an operation is dynamic, binding occurs at runtime instead of at compile time.

Dynamic binding directed by static types

Compile-time context information is captured and provided to a runtime binder for dynamic features in programming languages. For example, a C# run-time binder uses the information to perform a run-time bind with semantics matching the compiler's binding behavior. Dynamic programming language features supported relate to compound operations, events, delegates, member accessibility, dynamic-typed objects, structs passed by ref, arguments passed by name rather than position, extension methods, conditionally compiled methods, literal arguments, overflow checking, dynamic indexed properties, dynamic method groups, and static method groups.

Compile-time context for dynamically bound operations

User assemblies can be created by a compiler that can handle more than one type definition during execution. Local copies are created for respective authoritative types in a code library, and the local copies are marked with a local type identifier. An authoritative type identifier (e.g., a globally unique identifier (GUID)) is copied from the authoritative type to the local type, and functions and properties associated with the local type are also copied from the authoritative type. Authoritative types are resolved for requested types when a local assembly references a local type from a compiled user assembly. The local type can be identified by a local type identifier, and an authoritative type can be retrieved from the code library that has a same authoritative type identifier as the requested type. A local copy of the retrieved authoritative type can be copied to the local assembly under compilation. The compiler can then emit user assemblies that comprise merely local types.

Handling multiple definition of types

Growing community of inventors

Bellevue, WA, United States of America

Samuel Ng