Dragon Systems, Inc.

Scansoft, Inc.

Paul G Bamberg

James K Baker

Laurence Steven Gillick

Robert S Roth

Joel M Gould

Jed M Roberts

Charles E Ingold

Michael L Elkins

Jonathan P Yamron

Eric Fieleke

Paul A Van Mulbregt

Caroline B Huang

Mark F Sidell

Kenneth J Bayse

James Barnett

Claudia L Ellermann

Roger L Matus

Stijn VanEven

A computer is used to perform recorded actions. The computer receives recorded spoken utterances of actions. The computer then performs speech recognition on the recorded spoken utterances to generate texts of the actions. The computer then parses the texts to determine properties of the actions. After parsing the texts, permits the user to indicate that the user has reviewed one or more actions. The computer then automatically carries out the actions indicated as having been reviewed by the user.

Performing actions identified in recognized speech

System for segmenting text and identifying segment topics that match a user-specified topic. Topic tracking system creates a set of topic models from training text containing topic boundaries using a clustering algorithm. User supplies topic text. System creates a topic model of the topic text and adds the topic model to the set of topic models. User-supplied test text is segmented according to the set of topic models. Segments relating to the same topic as the topic text are selected.

Text segmentation and identification of topic using language models

A system and associated methods for recognizing compound words from an utterance containing a succession of one or more words from a predetermined vocabulary. At least one of the words in the utterance is a compound word including at least two formatives in succession, wherein those formatives are words in the vocabulary.

Speech recognition system for languages with compound words

A first speech recognition method receives an acoustic description of an utterance to be recognized and scores a portion of that description against each of a plurality of cluster models representing similar sounds from different words. The resulting score for each cluster is used to calculate a word score for each word represented by that cluster. Preferably these word scores are used to prefilter vocabulary words, and the description of the utterance includes a succession of acoustic decriptions which are compared by linear time alignment against a succession of acoustic models. A second speech recognition method is also provided which matches an acoustic model with each of a succession of acoustic descriptions of an utterance to be recognized. Each of these models has a probability score for each vocabulary word. The probability scores for each word associated with the matching acoustic models are combined to form a total score for that word. The preferred speech recognition method calculates to separate word scores for each currently active vocabulary word from a common succession of sounds. Preferably the first scores is calculated by a time alignment method, while the second score is calculated by a time independent method. Preferably this calculation of two separate word scores is used in one of multiple word-selecting phase of a recognition process, such as in the prefiltering phase.

Method for creating and using multiple-word sound models in speech

A method of speech analysis calculates one or more difference parameters for each of a sequence of acoustic frames, where each difference parameter is a function of the difference between an acoustic parameter in one frame and an acoustic parameter in a nearby frame. The method is used in speech recognition which compares the difference parameters of each frame against acoustic models representing speech units, where each speech-unit model has a model of the difference parameters associated with the frames of its speech unit. The difference parameters can be slope parameters or energy difference parameters. Slope parameters are derived by finding the difference between the energy of a given spectral parameter of a given frame and the energy, in a nearby frame, of a spectral parameter associated with a different frequency band. The resulting parameter indicates the extent to which the frequency of energy in the part of the spectrum represented by the given parameter is going up or going down. Energy difference parameters are calculated as a function of the difference between a given spectral parameter in one frame and a spectral parameter in a nearby frame representing the same frequency band. In one embodiment of the invention, dynamic programming compares the difference parameters of a sequence of frames to be recognized against a sequence of dynamic programming elements associated with each of a plurality of speech-unit models. In another embodiment of the invention, each speech-unit model represents one phoneme, and the speech-unit models for a plurality of phonemes are compared against individual frames, to associate with each such frame the one or more phonemes whose models compare most closely with it.

Method for speech analysis and speech recognition

A system is disclosed for recognizing a pattern in a collection of data given a context of one or more other patterns previously identified. Preferably the system is a speech recognition system, the patterns are words and the collection of data is a sequence of acoustic frames. During the processing of each of a plurality of frames, for each word in an active vocabulary, the system updates a likelihood score representing a probability of a match between the word and the frame, combines a language model score based on one or more previously recognized words with that likelihood score, and prunes the word from the active vocabulary if the combined score is below a threshold. A rapid match is made between the frames and each word of an initial vocabulary to determine which words should originally be placed in the active vocabulary. Preferably the system enables an operator to confirm the system's best guess as to the spoken word merely by speaking another word, to indicate that an alternate guess by the system is correct by typing a key associated with that guess, and to indicate that neither the best guess nor the alternate guesses was correct by typing yet another key. The system includes other features, including ones for determining where among the frames to look for the start of speech, and a special hardware processor for computing likelihood scores.

Speech recognition apparatus and method

Growing community of inventors

Marlborough, MA, United States of America

Paul G Bamberg