Capital One Services, LLC

Owen Reinert

Galen Rafferty

Samuel Sharpe

Michael Davis

Taylor Turner

Justin Au-yeung

Jeremy Edward Goodsitt

Brian Chandler Barr

In some implementations, a verification device may receive a request for an electronic exchange of information. The verification device may receive geographic location information associated with the request for the electronic exchange of information. The verification device may determine, using a machine learning model and based on the geographic location information, a validity of the request for the electronic exchange of information. The verification device may determine whether to execute the electronic exchange of information based on the determination of the validity of the request for the electronic exchange of information. The verification device may perform one of executing the electronic exchange of information or rejecting the request for the electronic exchange of information based on the determination of whether to execute the electronic exchange of information.

Dynamic verification of an electronic exchange of information

Systems and methods are disclosed herein for generating updated descriptions of items based on analyzing candidate embeddings of semantic representations of item descriptions. The system may obtain a text file describing an item. The system may provide the text file to a generative language model to generate semantic representations of the text file. The system may generate, based on the text file, candidate embeddings in an embedding space. The system may obtain embeddings associated with existing items. The system may determine subsets of the embeddings within a threshold distance. The system may compare the subsets. The system may determine attributes associated with a candidate embedding based on the comparison. The system may generate an updated text file based on the attributes.

Systems and methods for updating textual item descriptions using an embedding space

In some aspects, a computing system obtain a first dataset including a set of original data samples. The computing system may generate a key that indicates a location within the first dataset where spurious data should be stored. The computing system may determine a modified value associated with a first data sample of the set of original data samples, where the modified value causes a machine learning model to generate output that does not match a label associated with the first data sample. Based on the first data sample, the computer system may generate a spurious data sample comprising the modified value. Based on the key, the computer system may add the spurious data sample to the first dataset. In some aspects, based on a request for the first dataset, the computing system may remove the spurious data sample from the first dataset.

Generation of effective spurious data for model degradation

In some aspects, a computing system may iterate between adding spurious data to the dataset and training a model on the dataset. If the model's performance has not dropped by more than a threshold amount, then additional spurious data may be added to the dataset until the desired amount of performance decrease has been achieved. the computing system may determine the amount of impact each feature has on a model's output. The computing system may generate a spurious data sample by modifying values of features that are more impactful than other features. The computing system may repeatedly modify the spurious data that is stored in a dataset. If a cybersecurity incident occurs (e.g., the dataset is stolen or leaked), the system may identify when the cybersecurity incident took place based on the spurious data that is stored in the dataset.

Layered cybersecurity using spurious data samples

In some aspects, a computing system obtain a first dataset including a set of original data samples and a first set of spurious data samples. Based on a time period expiring, the computing system may replace the first set of spurious data samples in the first dataset with a second set of spurious data samples. The computing system may obtain an indication that a second dataset is available via a third-party computing device. Based on a determination that a subset of samples of the second dataset correspond to the first set of spurious data samples, the computing system may determine a time window in which an incident occurred. As an example, the time window may be determined to correspond to a time before the first set of spurious data samples were replaced with the second set of spurious data samples.

Growing community of inventors

Queens, NY, United States of America

Owen Reinert