Vmware, Inc.

Airwatch LLC

Omnissa, LLC

Nigitha Alugubelli

Shravan Shantharam

Kalyan Regula

Sharath Chowdary Gude

Jonathon Deriso

Xueliang Hua

Mohan Guttikonda

Joshua Dobelstein

Suman Rani

Jason Roszak

Rahul Kumar

Blake Ryan Watts

Abhishek Mishra

Nitin Rao

Bhavesh Krishna Kumar

Amrainder Singh

Siva Praveen Mummaneni

Parag Chakraborty

Sreedevi Mohan

Thiruekamban Poongkunran

Yaping Xie

Sabarishkumar Rajagopal

Sriharsha Mallur Apprameya

Disclosed are various approaches for enforcing policies for unmanaged applications. A user supplied script can be evaluated to determine whether an application is installed on a computing device. In response to a determination that the application is installed on the computing device, a request can be sent to a management service for at least one policy applicable to the application. The policy can be evaluated to determine whether the application complies with the policy.

Enforcing policies for unmanaged applications

Disclosed are various embodiments for resolving conflicts between workflows in a workflow processing system. A plurality of workflows stored in a workflow queue are evaluated to identify a common dependency of the plurality of workflows. Then, a version hierarchy is created for the common dependency of the plurality of workflows, the version hierarchy identifying multiple versions of the common dependency. In response to execution of a first one of the plurality of workflows stored in the workflow queue, the version hierarchy can be evaluated to identify the most recent version of the common dependency. Then, installation of the most recent version of the common dependency can be initiated.

Conflict resolution for device-driven management

Disclosed are various examples of unified application management for heterogeneous application delivery. Application metadata for various applications can be received from management services and can be analyzed according to application unification rules to identify multiple application variants of a particular application. A unified application can be generated to represent the multiple application variants that are identified. Application entitlements can be defined for the unified application model, and the management services can provide access to the particular application according to the entitlements.

Unified application management for heterogeneous application delivery

Disclosed are various examples for an architecture to distribute Win32 applications. In one example, a specification of a Win32 application and deployment options are received. A specification of target client devices is also received. Respective management agents executed in individual target client devices are directed to install the Win32 application according to the deployment options. Status information from the respective management agents indicating installation success or failure is received. A report is generated based at least in part on the status information.

WIN32 software distribution architecture

Systems and methods are provided for analyzing application usage on a user device and optimizing application and license distribution for user devices in an enterprise. An example system includes a management server and a data server. The management server can provide instructions to the user device to install a tracking application that gathers application-usage data using built-in functionality of the user device. The data server can receive and compile the application-usage data, creating compiled usage data. Using this compiled usage data, the management server can execute a rules engine to determine an action to take associated with at least one application on the user device, such as redistributing application licenses.

Systems and methods for analyzing application usage on a user device

Growing community of inventors

Atlanta, GA, United States of America

Nigitha Alugubelli