Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP

Hewlett-packard Development Company, L.p.

Hewlett-packard Company

Nigel John Edwards

Ludovic Emmanuel Paul Noel Jacquin

Geoffrey Ndu

Thomas M Laffey

Chris I Dalton

Jerome Alexander Rolia

Theofrastos Koulouris

Johannes Kirschnick

Michael R Krause

Hamza Attak

Liqun Chen

Melvin K Benedict

Luis E Luciani, Jr

Patrick Goldsack

Michael John Wray

Shiva R Dasari

Guilherme De Campos Magalhaes

Sebastian Gaisbauer

Adrian John Baldwin

Lawrence Wilcock

Fraser John Dickin

Antonio Lain

Simon Kai-Ying Shiu

Guillaume Alexandre Belrose

Sebastian Phillipp Schneider

Yongqi Wang

Paolo Faraboschi

Boris Balacheff

David Allen Moore

Sven Graupner

Eric L Pope

Martin Sadler

Blaine R Southam

Christopher L Dalton

Venkataraman Kamalaksha

Robert Thomas Owen Rees

Darrell R Haskell

Jonathon Hughes

David Kimler Altobelli

Jason Rouault

Luis E Luciani

Kairo Cesar Pinto Tavares

Kishore Kumar M

Mike Wray

Keith Mathew McAuliffe

Qun Zhong

Luis Luciani

Nicholas Mark Hawkins

Tony Roberts

Jose Maria Alcaraz Calero

Owen Rees

Leandro Augusto Penna Dos Santos

Francisco Plinio Oliveira Silveira

Rodrigo Jose Da Rosa Antunes

Sunil James

Walton A Rosen

Timothy Pletcher

Guilherme Magalhaes

A method for securing a plurality of compute nodes includes authenticating a hardware architecture of each of a plurality of components of the compute nodes. The method also includes authenticating a firmware of each of the plurality of components. Further, the method includes generating an authentication database comprising a plurality of authentication descriptions that are based on the authenticated hardware architecture and the authenticated firmware. Additionally, a policy for securing a specified subset of the plurality of compute nodes is implemented by using the authentication database.

Securing node groups

In some examples, a system receives information from electronic devices comprising network devices and computing devices in a computing environment that are subject to attestations of interfaces of the network devices and the computing devices. For each interface of a given computing device being attested, the system verifies that the interface of the given computing device is connected to an interface of a corresponding network device that is being attested. For each interface of a given network device being attested, the system verifies that the interface of the given network device is connected to an interface of a corresponding computing device that is being attested or an interface of another network device that is being attested. The system detects a presence of an unauthorized electronic device in the computing environment in response to determining that an interface of a computing device being attested or an interface of a network device being attested is not connected to a corresponding interface of an electronic device being attested.

Unauthorized device detection in a computing environment

Systems and methods are provided for agentless attestation. Agentless attestation can measure the integrity of customer servers without requiring an agent software program to be downloaded to each of the enterprise computer devices. In particular, the system can integrate several standalone components to measure the integrity of monitored devices. This also allows the data center to authenticate, verify, audit, and update any hardware change, including a Platform Certificate.

Agentless attestation as a service

In some examples, a system executes a monitor separate from an operating system (OS) that uses mapping information in accessing data in a physical memory. The monitor identifies, using the mapping information, invariant information, that comprises program code, of the OS without suspending execution of the OS, the identifying comprising the monitor accessing the physical memory independently of the OS. The monitor determines, based on monitoring the invariant information of the OS, whether a security issue is present.

Monitoring operating system invariant information

A technique includes an operating system agent of a computer system monitoring a process to detect whether an integrity of the process has been compromised. The monitoring includes the operating system agent scanning a data structure. The process executes in a user space, and the data structure is part of an operating system kernel space. The technique includes a hardware controller of the computer system listening for a heartbeat that is generated by the operating system agent. The hardware controller takes a corrective action in response to at least one of the hardware controller detecting an interruption of the heartbeat, or the operating system agent communicating to the hardware controller a security alert for the process.

Memory scan-based process monitoring

A process includes a first tenant of a plurality of tenants communicating with a security processor of a computer platform, via a first physical request interface of the security processor, to acquire ownership of a first command execution engine of the security processor associated with the first physical request interface. The process includes a second tenant of the plurality of tenants communicating with the security processor, via a second physical request interface of the security processor, to acquire ownership of a second command execution engine of the security processor associated with the second physical request interface. The process includes the security processor receiving a first request from the first tenant in the first physical interface, and the second processor receiving a second request from the second tenant in the second physical request interface. The process includes, pursuant to block, the first command execution engine processing the first request and the second command execution engine processing the second request to perform corresponding trusted computing operations.

Multiple physical request interfaces for security processors

In some examples, a system receives first measurements of data items used by a build server in building an executable program, the data items copied from a data repository to a storage partition that is separate from the data repository, and the storage partition to store the data items relating to building the executable program by the build server. The system determines, based on the first measurements and according to a policy specified for the storage partition, whether a corruption of the data items used by the build server in building the executable program has occurred.

Corruption determination of data items used by a build server

A method of certifying a state of a platform includes receiving one or more software elements of a software stack of the platform by an authentication module and performing a hash algorithm on the software stack to generate one or more hash values. The software stack uniquely determines a software state of the platform. The method includes generating creation data, a creation hash, and a creation ticket, corresponding to the hash values and sending the creation ticket to the platform. The method also includes receiving the creation ticket by the authentication module and certifying the creation data and the creation hash based on the creation ticket. The method further includes generating a certified structure based on the creation data and performing the hash algorithm on the certified structure to generate a hash of the certified structure. The certified structure uniquely determines the software state of the platform.

Verification of a provisioned state of a platform

A process includes, in a computer system, acquiring a first measurement that corresponds to a software container. Acquiring the measurement includes a hardware processor of the computer system measuring a given layer of a plurality of layers of layered file system structure corresponding to the software container. The given layer includes a plurality of files, and the first measurement includes a measurement of the plurality of files. The process includes storing the first measurement in a secure memory of the computer system. A content of the secure memory is used to verify an integrity of the software container.

Measuring containers

Examples disclosed herein relate to using an integrity manifest certificate to verify the state of a platform. A device identity of a device that has the device identity provisioned and stored in a security co-processor to retrieve an integrity proof from the security co-processor. The device includes at least one processing element, at least one memory device, and a bus including at least one bus device, and wherein the device identity is associated with a device identity certificate signed by a first authority. The integrity proof includes a representation of each of a plurality of hardware components including the at least one processing element, the at least one memory device, the at least one bus device, and a system board and a representation of plurality of firmware components included in the device. The integrity proof is provided to a certification station. The certification station determines that the integrity proof is an expected value based on an expected provisioning state of the device and the device identity. The certification station signs, using a second authority, an integrity manifest certificate, based on the integrity proof and the device identity. The integrity manifest certificate is stored.

Integrity manifest certificate

Examples disclosed herein relate to integrity monitoring of a computing system using a kernel that can update its own code. Trust of state information is verified. Kernel code and module code are loaded into memory that is accessible to a device separate from a processor that loads the kernel code and module code. A measurement module is verified and loaded into memory. The state information can correspond to multiple symbols. The measurement module can measure the state information corresponding to each of the respective symbols to generate a set of initial measurements. The set of initial measurements can be provided to a device for integrity monitoring. The device is to compare a current measurement with an initial measurement to determine if a potential violation occurred. The device is to use a representation of a jump table to determine whether the potential violation is a violation.

Measuring integrity of computing system using jump table

Examples disclosed herein relate to performing a verification check in response to receiving notification. A computing system includes a host processor, memory coupled to the host processor, and a device separate from the host processor capable of accessing the memory. The host processor has a page table base register. The host processor is configured to send a notification to the device when the page table base register changes. The device performs a verification check in response to receiving the notification.

Perform verification check in response to change in page table base register

Examples include configuration of a memory controller for copy-on-write with a resource controller. Some examples include, in response to a determination to take a snapshot of memory accessible to a first component, a resource controller configuring a memory controller to treat location IDs, mapped to initial memory locations of the accessible memory, as copy-on-write for the first component and not for a second component independent of the resource controller after the configuring.

Configuration of a memory controller for copy-on-write with a resource controller

Examples disclosed herein relate to integrity monitoring of a computing system. Trust of state information is verified. Kernel code and module code are loaded into memory that is accessible to a device separate from a processor that loads the kernel code and module code. A measurement module is verified and loaded into memory. The state information can correspond to multiple symbols. The measurement module can measure the state information corresponding to each of the respective symbols to generate a set of initial measurements. The set of initial measurements can be provided to a device for integrity monitoring.

Measuring integrity of computing system

Growing community of inventors

Bristol, United Kingdom

Nigel John Edwards