Onetrust, LLC

Mithun Babu

Jonathan Blake Brannon

Kevin Jones

Patrick Whitney

Madhusudhan Kunhambu

Casey Hill

Subramanian Viswanathan

Anand Balasubramanian

Jeffrey Baucom

Rajneesh Kesavan

Mohamed Kabad

Jayamohan Puthenveetil

Brian Kelly

Sathish Gopalakrishnan

Sharath Chandra Chavva

Raju Bokade

Santosh Kumar Koti

Austin Proctor

Santhosh Kumar Koti

Data processing systems and methods, according to various embodiments, are adapted for determining a categorization for each tracking tool that executes on a particular webpage based on a variety of criteria, such as the purpose of the tracking tool and its source script. The system may compare the characteristics of tracking tools on a webpage to a database of known tracking tools to determine the appropriate categorization. When a user visits the webpage, the system analyzes these categories and determines whether the tracking tool should be permitted to run based on the categories and/or other criteria, such as whether the user has consented to the use of that type of tracking tool.

Data processing systems and methods for automatically blocking the use of tracking tools

A system and method for determining consent user interface validity for a provided consent user interface of a web form presenting consent information, comprising: accessing a consent user interface presented on a web form; determining one or more configuration attributes of the consent user interface; accessing one or more privacy regulations associated with presenting consent information; comparing the one or more configuration attributes of the consent user interface to each of the one or more privacy regulations; determining whether the consent user interface is compliant with each of the one or more privacy regulations; and in response to determining that the consent user interface is not compliant with one or more privacy regulations, flagging the consent user interface.

Data processing systems for cookie compliance testing with website scanning and related methods

A method for scanning a website and tracking data subject interaction with the website, comprising: determining a data subject is interacting with a particular website; determining one or more website parameters associated with the particular website, the one or more website parameters associated with the particular website include scanning the particular website to determine website cookies that capture data subject information, and determining a website category of the particular website; determining a geo-location of the data subject when the data subject is interacting with the particular website; determining one or more data subject consent parameters based at least in part on the one or more website parameters associated with the particular website and the geo-location of the data subject when the data subject is interacting with the particular website; and applying the one or more data subject consent parameters to the data subject interaction with the particular website.

In particular embodiments, a consent conversion optimization system is configured to test two or more test consent interfaces against one another to determine which of the two or more consent interfaces results in a higher conversion percentage (e.g., to determine which of the two or more interfaces lead to a higher number of end users and/or data subjects providing a requested level of consent for the creation, storage and use or cookies by a particular website). The system may, for example, analyze end user interaction with each particular test consent interface to determine which of the two or more user interfaces: (1) result in a higher incidence of a desired level of provided consent; (2) are easier to use by the end users and/or data subjects (e.g., take less time to complete, require a fewer number of clicks, etc.); (3) etc.

Consent conversion optimization systems and related methods

Growing community of inventors

Atlanta, GA, United States of America

Mithun Babu