Sas Institute Inc.

Jinxin Yi

Varunraj Valsaraj

Kedar Shriram Prabhudesai

Jorge Manuel Gomes Da Silva

Mohammadreza Nazari

Jonathan Lee Walker

Xunlei Wu

Xingqi Du

Afshin Oroojlooyjadid

Davood Hajinezhad

Hamza Mustafa Ghadyali

Bahar Biller

Alexander Richard Phelps

Roger Lee Baldridge, Jr

Xinmin Wu

Pelin Cay

Bryan C Harris

Alexius Kofi Ameyaw Boakye, Jr

Bahadir Aral

Rebecca Gallagher

Necip Baris Kacar

Daniel Keongson Woo

Charlotte Kay Crain

Sertalp Bilal Cay

William Lloyd Wisotsky

Justin Joseph Lukas

A system and method include reformulating an optimization program as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model and in a single iteration, solving the optimization program by inputting the QUBO model into a quantum computing solver, instructing the quantum computing solver to generate a plurality of solutions to the optimization program based on the QUBO model, receiving the plurality of solutions from the quantum computing solver, inputting each of the plurality of solutions into a nonquantum computing solver, wherein the nonquantum computing solver uses each of the plurality of solutions as a starting point to continue solving the optimization program, and outputting an optimal solution to the optimization program from the nonquantum computing solver.

Hybrid quantum/nonquantum approach to NP-hard combinatorial optimization

Requests for computing resources and other resources can be predicted and managed. For example, a system can determine a baseline prediction indicating a number of requests for an object over a future time-period. The system can then execute a first model to generate a first set of values based on seasonality in the baseline prediction, a second model to generate a second set of values based on short-term trends in the baseline prediction, and a third model to generate a third set of values based on the baseline prediction. The system can select a most accurate model from among the three models and generate an output prediction by applying the set of values output by the most accurate model to the baseline prediction. Based on the output prediction, the system can cause an adjustment to be made to a provisioning process for the object.

Predicting and managing requests for computing resources or other resources

A computing system responsive to obtaining original image data, detects a set of data point(s), in the original image data, that indicates an object. The system determines, based on the set of data point(s), a set of pixels associated with the object in the original image data. The system generates an alternative visual identifier for the object that provides a unique identifier for the set of pixels absent in the original image data. The system generates, autonomously from intervention by any user of the computing system, pixel information to conceal feature(s) of the object. The system obtains modified image data comprising the alternative visual identifier. The modified image data further comprises the feature(s) of the object in the original image data visually concealed in the modified image data according to the pixel information. The system outputs an image representation of a trajectory of the object through the modified image data.

Real-time concealed object tracking

A computing system obtains image data representing images. Each of the images is captured at different time points of a physical environment. The physical environment comprises a first object and a second object. The computing system executes a control system to augment the physical environment. The control system detects a group forming in the images. The control system tracks an aspect of a movement, of a given object, in the group. The control system simulates the physical environment and the movement, of the given object, in the group in a simulated environment. The control system evaluates simulated actions in the simulated environment for a predefined objective for the physical environment. The predefined objective is related to an interaction between objects in the group. The control system generates based on evaluated simulated actions and autonomously from involvement by any user of the control system, an indication to augment the physical environment.

Real-time spatial and group monitoring and optimization

A computing system receives historical data. The historical data comprises physical actions taken in an experiment in a physical environment. The experiment comprises user-defined stages. The historical data comprises a recorded outcome, according to user-defined performance indicator(s) related to the user-defined stages, for each physical action taken in the experiment. The system generates, by a discrete event simulator, a computing representation of a simulated environment of the physical environment. The simulated environment comprises processing stages. The system obtains simulation data. The simulation data comprises simulated actions taken by the discrete event simulator. The simulation data comprises a predicted outcome, according to user-defined performance indicator(s) related to the processing stages, for each simulated action taken by the discrete event simulator. The system validates accuracy of the discrete event simulator at predicting the recorded outcome in the experiment. The system trains a computing agent according to a sequential decision-making algorithm.

Discrete event simulation with sequential decision making

One exemplary system can receive a selection of a dataset via a graphical user interface (GUI). The dataset can represent a time-series projection. The system can feed the dataset into a first machine-learning model to obtain an output indicating whether the time-series projection has a data value that should be overridden with an override value. If the first machine-learning model indicates that the time-series projection has the data value that should be overridden, the system can feed the data value as input to a second machine-learning model to obtain an output indicating whether the override value should be greater than or less than the data value. The system can then render a visual directionality cue within the GUI based on the output from the second machine-learning model. The visual directionality cue can provide guidance for overriding the data value.

Interactive graphical user interface with override guidance

A computing device quantifies an expected benefit from a calibrated coefficient of variation (CV) and/or a calibrated service level (SL). The target optimization model determines a number and a time a new requisition is placed for an item at each node of the plurality of nodes. A validation time value is updated using an incremental time value and the process is repeated until the validation time value is greater than or equal to a stop time.

System for calibrating and validating parameters for optimization

In accordance with the teachings described herein, systems and methods are provided for optimizing inventory in a multi-echelon inventory distribution network having at least a first echelon and a second echelon.  An example method may include the steps of: receiving information identifying an inventory pool that includes at least two inventory locations within the first or second echelons; determining inventory excesses or shortages at inventory locations within the inventory pool; determining an inventory transshipment plan for transferring inventory between two or more of the inventory locations in the inventory pool based at least in part on the inventory excesses or shortages; and determining an inventory replenishment plan for replenishing inventory at one or more inventory locations in the first echelon from one or more primary supply locations in the second echelon, the inventory replenishment plan being based at least in part on the inventory excesses or shortages and accounting for any inventory transfers identified in the inventory transshipment plan.

Systems and methods for multi-echelon inventory planning with lateral transshipment

Growing community of inventors

Cary, NC, United States of America

Jinxin Yi