Bank of America Corporation

Jeanne M Moulton

Jasher David Fowles

John Barrett Hall

Kerry Kurt Simpkins

Murali Santhanam

Michael Joseph Pepe

Robert E Mills, Jr

Athena Barlow

Susan Deans

Michael Gerald Smith

Shawn Cart Gunsolley

Timmy Leo Gauvin

Clarence Edward Lee, Ii

Charles Christopher Harbinson

Leslie LaRock

Kenneth R Cox

Tami Marie Shepard

Christopher David Greth

Georgeann Paschal Gregory

Timothy Alan Mincey

Raymond William Schall, Jr

Shashi R Warrier

Michael J Pepe

Haywood P Enloe

Systems for item validation and image evaluation are provided. In some examples, a system may receive an instrument and associated data. The instrument may be received and at least one of a bill pay profile and a user profile may be retrieved. The bill pay profile and user profile may each include a plurality of previously processed instruments that have been determined to be valid and/or authentic. The instrument may be compared to the plurality of previously processed instruments to determine whether one or more elements of the instrument being evaluated match one or more corresponding elements of the plurality of previously processed instruments. Matching or non-matching elements may be identified. In some examples, one or more user interfaces may be generated displaying the instruments and including any highlighting or enhancements identifying matching or non-matching elements.

Enhanced item validation and image evaluation system

Systems for image evaluation and dynamic cropping are provided. In some examples, a system, may receive an instrument or image of an instrument. Identifying information may be extracted from the instrument or image of the instrument. Based on the extracted identifying information, a check/check image profile may be retrieved. In some examples, expected size and/or shape data may be extracted from the check/check image profile. The extracted expected size and/or shape data may be compared to size and/or shape data from the received instrument or image of the instrument to identify any anomalies (e.g., to determine whether the expected size and/or shape data matches the size and/or shape data of the received instrument or image of the instrument. If the expected size and/or shape data does not match size and/or shape data from the received instrument or image of the instrument, the instrument or image of the instrument may be programmatically modified and a modified image of the instrument may be generated.

Image evaluation and dynamic cropping system

Systems for profile management and control are provided. A system may receive an instrument or image of an instrument. In some examples, data may be extracted from the instrument or image of the instrument and a document profile may be retrieved based on the extracted data. Images within the document profile may be evaluated to identify a type of document for each document. In some examples, a total number of documents of each type may be determined or identified. The total number of documents may be compared to a threshold. If the total number of documents is below the threshold, the documents or images in the profile may be maintained. If the total number of documents is at or above the threshold, in some examples, each document may be further evaluated to determine or identify documents or document images for deletion. In some arrangements, the profile may be refreshed and documents or images identified for deletion may be deleted.

Enterprise profile management and control system

Systems for dynamic profile control are provided. A system may receive first check data that may include a number of checks written over a predetermined time period for an account. The first check data may be analyzed to determine the number of checks written in a predetermined time period and the number may be compared to one or more thresholds. Based on the comparison, a first tier level may be identified for the account. A profile record may be generated including a check profile that may include one or more parameters based on the identified first tier level. The system may then build the profile by adding checks to the profile upon determining that the checks meet predefined criteria. After a predetermined time period has expired, the system may process additional data to determine whether the identified tier level and associated parameters should be modified.

Dynamic profile control system

Systems for item validation and image evaluation are provided. In some examples, a system may receive an instrument and associated data. The instrument may be received and a user profile may be retrieved. The user profile may include a plurality of previously processed instruments that have been determined to be valid and/or authentic. The instrument may be compared to the plurality of previously processed instruments to determine whether one or more elements of the instrument being evaluated match one or more corresponding elements of the plurality of previously processed instruments. Matching or non-matching elements may be identified. In some examples, one or more user interfaces may be generated displaying the instruments and including any highlighting or enhancements identifying matching or non-matching elements.

Item validation and image evaluation system

Item validation and image evaluation system with feedback loop

Systems for dynamic profile control are provided. A system may receive first check data that may include a number of checks written over a predetermined time period for an account, or the like. The first check data may be analyzed to determine a number of checks written in a predetermined time period and the volume or number may be compared to one or more thresholds or ranges. Based on the comparison, a first tier level may be identified for the account or the like. A profile record may be generated including a check profile that may include one or more parameters determined based on the identified first tier level. The system may then build the profile by adding checks or other documents to the profile upon determining that the checks or other documents meet predefined criteria. After a predetermined time period has expired, the system may process additional data to determine whether the identified tier level and associated parameters should be modified.

Growing community of inventors

Concord, NC, United States of America

Jeanne M Moulton