Keptel, Inc.

James P Hogan

Daniel Lynch

A system is disclosed for verifying the integrity of each one of a number of communication paths, illustratively telephone subscriber loops, that runs between a near end location, illustratively a telephone company central office, and a corresponding remote ('far end') location(s). This system utilizes circuitry, such as a line verification module, that is located at the far end of each path to impart a selected test signal specifically a selected one of a number of sub-audible frequencies, thereto. In one embodiment, the circuitry continously transmits a test signal over the path. The level of the test signal is automatically adjusted such that this signal remains at an approximately constant amplitude regardless of whether that path is in an on-hook or off-hook condition. Central office monitoring circuitry is connected to the near end of every path being verified. For each such path, the monitoring circuitry first 'learns' the frequency associated with the test signal appearing over that path, and thereafter detects a cessation or unexpected change in the test signal occurring at the near end thereof that is indicative of a possible loss of path (e.g. loop) integrity and, in turn, provides an appropriate notification specifying that loss.

Loop status verification system

A system is disclosed for verifying the integrity of each one of a number of communication paths, illustratively telephone subscriber loops, that runs between a near end location, illustratively a telephone central office, and corresponding remote ('far end') location(s). This system utilizes circuitry, such as a line verification module, that is located at the far end of the path to detect one or more conditions thereat (e.g. loop current and loop voltage) that are indicative of normal operation of the path, e.g. proper on-hook and off-hook conditions. As long as the path is normally operating at the far end, this circuitry would then transmit a test signal, e.g. a selected one of a number of sub-audible frequencies, over the path to the near end. This test signal is chosen to be substantially transparent to normal communication (e.g. local telephone company signalling and transmission frequencies) occurring over that path. Central office monitoring circuitry, illustratively containing a line test unit and a controller, would be connected to the path at its near end. This monitoring circuitry would detect any cessation or unexpected change in the test signal (i.e. a mismatch against a prescribed test signal that is expected to appear over the path) occurring at the near end that is indicative of a possible loss of path (e.g. loop) integrity and, in turn, would provide an appropriate notification specifying the current loss.

Growing community of inventors

Jackson, NJ, United States of America

James P Hogan