Chrysler Corporation

Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Chrysler Motors Corporation

Gary D Dawson

William B Blomquist

Roland T Richardson

Glen E Tallarek

Chris J Booms

Mark E Hope

John E Letcher

John E Cook

Ronald A Reese, Ii

Kerry D Franks

David P Ploucha

Donald H Kerska

Gary M Pallach

Richard O Geiss

Fadi S Kanafani

Murray Busato

Susan A Aldridge

Marion Bugin, Jr

A method is provided for testing a thermostat in a motor vehicle. The method includes an engine warm-up model and a thermostat diagnostic. The engine warm-up model predicts the temperature that the engine coolant temperature should be equal to at a given time after start-up. This is based on the engine coolant temperature at start-up, ambient air temperature, and how the vehicle is driven subsequent to start-up. This predicted engine coolant temperature is compared to the actual engine coolant temperature as read by an engine coolant temperature sensor. The error between the predicted engine coolant temperature and the actual engine coolant temperature is calculated and integrated over time. The thermostat diagnostic runs at a pre-selected temperature after start-up and compares the integrated error to a predetermined threshold value. Depending upon the results of the comparison, a pass, fail, or inconclusive condition is determined.

Engine warm-up model and thermostat rationality diagnostic

A method is provided for detecting a small or gross leak in an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle. The method includes initially purging and then sealing the evaporative emission control system. A vacuum switch coupled to the evaporative emission control system is then monitored for an opening event caused by a loss of a natural vacuum created in the evaporative emission control system. If said opening event is detected, the method determines if a leak check timer has exceeded a first or second predetermined threshold value. If the leak check timer has not exceeded said first predetermined threshold value a first fault code is set indicating that the gross leak has been detected. If the leak check timer has not exceeded the second predetermined threshold value, a second fault code is set indicating that the small leak has been detected. The first threshold value corresponds to an amount of time required for a leak to be detected having a diameter of about 0.070 inches or greater. The second threshold value corresponds to an amount of time required for a leak to be detected having a diameter of about 0.040 inches or greater.

Small/gross leak check

A method is provided for cleansing a seal of a device used for sealing an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle. The method starts by determining if a request to close the device has been made. If the request to close the device has been made, the method cycles the device a plurality of times to press and lift the seal off of a seat repeatedly. The method also determines if the seal is closed after the cycling step. If the seal is not closed after the cycling step, the method closes the seal. Preferably, the cycling step includes cycling the device at a pre-selected duty cycle, frequency and cycle count. The duty cycle, frequency, and cycle count correspond to calibration tables prepared for the particular device employed to insure that the seal strikes its seat about three times before sealing.

Seal cleansing routine

A method is provided for determining the rationality of a device for monitoring the pressure within an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle. The method includes opening a valve of the evaporative emission control system and determining if a vacuum switch of the evaporative emission control system opened. If the vacuum switch opened, a code is set indicating that the vacuum switch passed an opening test. If the vacuum switch did not open, the method determines if a fail timer is greater than a first fail threshold value. The first fail threshold value corresponds to an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should open after said valve is opened. If the fail timer is greater than the fail threshold value, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch failed the opening test. If the fail timer is less than or equal to the first fail threshold value, the method increments the fail timer. If the vacuum switch passed the opening test, the method closes the valve of the evaporative emission control system and applies a vacuum thereto. The method then determines if the vacuum switch closed due to the vacuum. If the vacuum switch closed, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch passed a closing test. If the vacuum switch did not close, the method determines if the fail timer is greater than a second fail threshold value. The second fail threshold value corresponds to an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should close after the vacuum is applied. If the fail timer is greater than the second fail threshold value, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch failed the closing test. If the fail timer is less than or equal to the second fail threshold value, the method increments the fail timer.

Purge monitor/switch rationality diagnostics

A method is provided for detecting a very small leak in an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle. The method includes sealing the evaporative emission control system at a key-off event and monitoring a vacuum switch coupled to the evaporative emission control system for a closing event due to a natural vacuum created in the evaporative emission control system as it cools. If the closing event is not detected, the method determines if a leak detection timer has exceeded a predetermined threshold value. If the timer has exceeded the predetermined threshold value, the method sets a fault code indicating that the very small leak has been detected. Preferably, the leak detection timer includes a first time value corresponding to an amount of time the automotive vehicle has been operating since a previous small leak detection test was conducted and a second time value corresponding to an amount of time the automotive vehicle has been inoperative since a previous small leak detection test was conducted. The first time value includes a series of individual trip times of the automotive vehicle while the second time value includes a series of individual inoperative session times of the automotive vehicle.

Evaporative emission control for very small leak detection

A method is provided for testing an evaporative emission control system for a missing or loose fuel cap comprising detecting a refueling event and running a leak detection test of the evaporative emission control system to determine if a large leak is present. If a large leak is detected, the methodology sets a fault code and activates a driver warning lamp indicating a potential cap sealing problem. The leak detection test is repeatedly re-executed after the large leak is detected to determine when the large leak condition ceases. When the large leak condition ceases, the previously set fault code is removed and the driver warning lamp is deactivated. If the large leak does not cease and is detected again after the next refueling event when an opportunity for resealing the cap existed, a new fault code is set indicating that the potential cap sealing problem is a persistent problem so that the integrity of the evaporative system may need to be tested. After setting the new fault code, fuel cap specific leak detection testing is suspended until the condition is serviced and the fault code is cleared or a normal leak detection test determines that there is no longer a problem. If no large leak is detected, the fuel cap is assumed to be properly sealed.

Evaporative system leak detection feature after a refueling event

A method of leak detection for an evaporative emission control system is provided which determines if a potential leak is present in a portion of the system. The method includes the steps of monitoring an engine shut-off event and subsequently sealing the evaporative emission control system atmospheric vent such that the evaporative emission control system's internal pressure is isolated from external influences, absent a leak. After sealing the system, the internal pressure of the system is monitored for changes which should occur upon the cooling of the evaporative emission control system components. That is, when the components cool, the pressure within the sealed system should decrease. If the internal pressure of the evaporative emissions control system reduces so as to create a vacuum, the methodology assesses that no leaks in the system are present. However, if the internal pressure within the evaporative emission control system does not create a vacuum upon cooling of the components, the methodology assesses that a potential leak exists in the system.

Evaporative system leak detection for an evaporative emission control

A control valve for an onboard refuel vapor recovery system employing two bleed orifices in the body of the control valve that are effective to provide different time intervals for continuing to dispense fuel into the fuel tank after an initial fill nozzle shut-off.

Control valve for onboard refueling vapor recovery fuel system

A method of leak detection for an evaporative emission control system during periods of low engine vacuum includes the steps of pulsing a leak detection pump at a predetermined rate and determining whether engine vacuum level is low. The method also includes the steps of maintaining pressurization of the evaporative emission control system if the engine vacuum level is low, maintaining pressurization behind a vapor canister vent valve if the engine vacuum level is low, and detecting for leaks in the evaporative emission control system after a normal engine vacuum level is attained.

Method of leak detection during low engine vacuum for an evaporative

A method of de-pressurizing an evaporative emission control system includes the steps of pulsing a leak detection pump at a predetermined rate and purging accumulated vapors from a vapor canister. The method also includes the steps of determining whether a last pump period is greater than or equal to a predetermined system de-pressurization mode pump period and continuing the method if the last pump period is less than the system de-pressurization mode pump period.

Method of de-pressurizing an evaporative emission control system

A method of leak detection for an evaporative emission control system to determine if a leak is present in a portion of the system includes the steps of energizing a leak detection pump to close a canister vent control valve of the system and pressurize the system, and determining whether a possible pinched line of the system has occurred.

Method of leak detection for an evaporative emission control system

A method of checking for purge flow in an evaporative emission control system includes the steps of determining if there is a fault in a leak detection pump, de-energizing the leak detection pump if there is a fault, and determining the state of a leak detection pump switch. The method also includes the steps of concluding a pump switch closed state if the pump switch is not opened, concluding a pump switch opened state if the pump switch is not closed, and monitoring a purge duty cycle until the evaporative emission control system is depressurized.

Method of checking for purge flow in an evaporative emission control

An assembly for testing an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle which controls emission of volatile fuel vapors. The assembly is used to determine if a leak is present in a portion of the system which includes a vapor collection canister. The leak detection assembly incorporates a vacuum actuated canister vent control valve which seals the evaporative system so the leak detection test can be performed. A vacuum actuated pump which performs a leak detection test. An engine control unit initializes the pump by drawing air into a pump cavity and also closes the vent control valve. After the initialization period, the pump is activated to pressurize the evaporative emission control system. Once a control pressure is achieved, the cycle rate starts to drop off. If no leak exists in the system, the pump will eventually stop pumping. If there is a leak, the pump will continue to pump at a rate that will be representative of the flow characteristics of the size of the leak. After the test has been concluded, the vent control valve will unseal the system after the vacuum has been bled out through the orifice/check valve that has been holding the seal during the test.

Leak detection assembly

A method of pinched line detection for an evaporative emission control system to determine if a pinched line is present within the system includes the steps of pulsing a leak detection pump at a predetermined rate and determining if a last pump period is less than a predetermined possible pinched line period limit. The method also includes the steps of concluding a possible pinched line if the last pump period is not less than the possible pinched line period limit and concluding that there is not a possible pinched line if the last pump period is greater than or equal to the possible pinched line period limit.

Method of pinched line detection for an evaporative emission control

A method of testing an evaporative emission control system to determine if the evaporative emission control system has reached a predetermined pressure includes the steps of pulsing a leak detection pump at a predetermined rate and determining if a last pump period is greater than or equal to a predetermined test mode period threshold. The method also includes the steps of pressurizing the evaporative emission control system if the last pump period is less than a test mode period threshold and continuing the method if the last pump period is equal to or greater than the test mode period threshold.

Growing community of inventors

Rochester, MI, United States of America

Gary D Dawson