Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC

Eric I Maino

Marc Edward Mercuri

Zeyad Rajabi

Ryan J Cavanaugh

Dmitri A Klementiev

Scott M Louvau

Kristopher Makey

Xuechun Li

Vijaya K Upadya

Christopher A Smith

Gabriel Esparza-Romero

Damon C Tivel

Kyrylo Osenkov

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, an event interface system, hereinafter the system, provides a record storage system and facilitates a proof of custody, proof of chain of custody and proof against tampering for a record by deploying a hash of the record on the blockchain and storing the record on an off-chain storage.

Blockchain proof of custody, proof against tampering, proof of chain of custody

A blockchain analytics system facilitates determination of parameters of blockchain objects for analytics. Examples of parameters of the blockchain object may include an identity of a participant, a role of a participant, a type of the blockchain object and the like. The system may store parameters of blockchain objects in the data repository. The system may use the determined parameters to generate a machine learning blockchain analytics model. The system may generate visualizations, detect patterns and/or for detecting anomalies based on the machine learning blockchain analytics model.

Blockchain analytics

An Internet of Things (IoT) blockchain interface system facilitates receiving and deploying events from an IoT gateway to a blockchain using the event stack. The system also provides an interface between events that may affect objects on the blockchain from IoT sensors. The system also serves to authenticate IoT events such as sensor data.

Internet of things blockchain interface

An event interface system facilitates the creation of a blockchain object and deployment of the blockchain object on a blockchain. The system also provides an interface between events that may affect the blockchain object and the blockchain object stored on the blockchain. Additionally, the system can monitor a state of the blockchain object and control interactions with the blockchain object and updates to the blockchain object according to the determined state.

Blockchain object interface

An event interface system facilitates the creation and deployment of a first blockchain object and a second blockchain object on a first blockchain and a second blockchain respectively. The system also provides an interface between the first blockchain object and the second blockchain object via the event hub. Additionally, the system can allow interaction between blockchain objects on a private blockchain and a participant on the system.

Blockchain object deployment and synchronization across blockchains

A generated object model engine abstracts actions, used in test cases, in a manner to produce new object model types that are independent of an underlying code implementation. The generated object model engine analyzes action classes to aggregate a set of actions having similarly-related class types. Action classes having similarly-related class types are then used to form a new object model type. The new object model type may be used in a test case to hide the action's code implementation from the test case.

Generated object model for test automation

A test case can be run with actions from the test case being executed in multiple execution paths. This can be done with the aid of an action broker. For example, the broker may identify available automation implementations for the actions and use a priority list to select between available automation implementations for executing an action from the test case. The broker may also perform conversions of results of actions for use by implementations executing other actions in different execution paths, as well as passing results between implementations in different execution paths.

Multi-path brokered test automation execution

A test case is abstracted into a re-useable script or other declarative form that expresses the intent of a task rather that defining how the test will be performed. Tools translate the declarative test into a series of steps corresponding to code that implements the action indicated in the declarative test. The schema for the tests can be dynamic. New forms of test cases can take advantage of new actions so that the library of actions can be extended. Libraries are interchangeable. Test cases can be generated using a state machine. New test cases can be composed dynamically using a state machine to create new test cases.

Growing community of inventors

Seattle, WA, United States of America

Eric I Maino