The Mathworks, Inc.

David M Boissy

John Edward Ciolfi

William James Aldrich

Stacey Gage

George Quievryn

Barton D Addis

Disclosed herein are tools and methods for selecting and scheduling executable test program the use in testing, evaluating, monitoring, and analyzing an executable test program or any portion thereof. The tools and methods disclosed can analyze an executable test program developed in a text based programming language environment and an executable test program developed in a graphical modeling based programming environment. The tools and methods identify and analyze the quantitative measures of an executable test program and compute one or more scores for the executable test program. The tools and methods can use the scores computed to rank and order the executable test programs for execution to test an executable program or any portion thereof.

Scheduling tests based on a valuation system

A device receives code that is an executable representation of a dynamic system that includes a behavior that changes over time, and executes one or more portions of the code. The device determines coverage information associated with the executing code, where the coverage information provides a measure of completeness associated with the executing code. The device receives a selected option for displaying the coverage information, and provides for display a time-based view of the coverage information based on the selected option. The device permits a user to manipulate one or more time periods associated with the time-based view.

Code and model coverage as a time series

A system facilitates verification of computer code. The system receives multiple versions of the computer code. A code verification engine checks the received code against one or more metrics, such as coding standard violations. A code differencing compares the received versions of computer code, and identifies the differences between them. An interactive presentation unit presents one or more analysis reports regarding coding violations located in the received versions. An analysis report includes a plurality of entries hierarchically organized in conformance with the entities of the received code. The analysis report indicates the number of coding violations identified for the entities of the received code in a side-by-side, comparative arrangement. A user can thus compare the number of coding violations present in the received versions.

Growing community of inventors

Harvard, MA, United States of America

David M Boissy