The Boeing Company

Can Onur

Pieter Van Gils

Barend-Jan Van Bruchem

Maxim Constantijn Vos

Daniel Ramiro Rebollo

A method, node, and computer-readable medium are provided to convert a proprietary model to a tool-agnostic surrogate model using a functional mockup interface (FMI) standard. A proprietary model is received as a functional-mockup unit (FMU) An automated dataset generation is performed on the FMU to create input/output datasets based on design of experiments and input requirements. Steady-state operational-points are determined. The tool-agnostic surrogate model is generated based on the input/output datasets and the steady-state operational-points. The tool-agnostic surrogate model is output as an output FMU model that is free of licensing requirements of a license for the proprietary model. The tool-agnostic surrogate model may be a steady-state surrogate model, a dynamic surrogate model, or a combination thereof.

License-free surrogate model generation

A device for pilot training includes a memory, an interface, and one or more processors. The memory is configured to store at least one computational model of at least one human sensory system. The interface is configured to receive sensor data and aircraft state data from a flight simulator. The sensor data includes pilot activity data and motion data. The motion data is indicative of detected motion of a simulated aircraft of the flight simulator. The processor(s) are configured to process the motion data and the pilot activity data based on the at least one computational model to predict a pilot estimated aircraft state. The processor(s) are configured to determine an estimated error based on a comparison of the pilot estimated aircraft state and a detected aircraft state. The aircraft state data indicates the detected aircraft state. The processor(s) are configured to provide the estimated error to a second device.

Quantitative pilot evaluation during training

A method for automatic generation of integrated test procedures using system test procedures includes generating a system test case for each system model of a plurality of system models. The method also includes automatically generating an integrated test harness including a group of interacting system models of the plurality of system models. An output signal from one or more of the interacting system models is an input signal to one or more other interacting system models. The method additionally includes automatically generating an integrated test case for each system model in the integrated test harness and automatically running the integrated test case using an integrated test procedure. The method further includes generating an integrated test procedure coverage report in response to running the integrated test case.

Growing community of inventors

Munich, Germany

Can Onur