Freescale Semiconductor,inc.

Cirrus Logic Inc.

Brad L Zwernemann

Roman A Dyba

Dayong Zhou

Perry P He

John L Melanson

Dana John Taipale

Lucio F C Pessoa

Kaichow Lau

Hongyang Deng

Circuitry for acoustic crosstalk cancellation between first and second acoustic signals, the circuitry comprising: crosstalk cancellation circuitry configured to: receive a first audio signal and, based on the received first audio signal, generate a first crosstalk cancellation signal; receive a second audio signal and, based on the received second audio signal, generate a second crosstalk cancellation signal; combine the first crosstalk cancellation signal with a signal indicative of the second audio signal to generate a first crosstalk cancellation circuitry output signal; and combine the second crosstalk cancellation signal with a signal indicative of the first audio signal to generate a second crosstalk cancellation circuitry output signal; and output stage circuitry configured to: receive the first crosstalk cancellation circuitry output signal and, based on the received first crosstalk cancellation circuitry, generate a first drive signal for driving a first speaker to generate the first acoustic signal; and receive the second crosstalk cancellation circuitry output signal and, based on the received second crosstalk cancellation circuitry, generate a second drive signal for driving a second speaker to generate the second acoustic signal, wherein a parameter of the crosstalk cancellation circuitry is variable based on one or more of: a position of a user of a host device incorporating the circuitry with respect to the host device; a volume setting of the host device; a level of the first and/or second crosstalk cancellation signal; and an operational parameter of the output stage circuitry.

Acoustic crosstalk cancellation

A method of obtaining a directional microphone signal, the method comprising: receiving first and second microphone signals from first and second microphones separated by a distance; obtaining a combined microphone signal based on one or more of the first and second microphone signals; obtaining a difference microphone signal by subtracting the second microphone signal from the first microphone signal; obtaining a transformed combined microphone signal by applying a Hilbert transform to the combined microphone signal; combining the transformed combined microphone signal with the difference microphone signal to obtain the directional microphone signal.

Apparatus and method for obtaining directional audio signals

In a data processing system, a method includes receiving samples of a send path input signal (Sin) and samples of a receive path input signal (Rin); in response to receiving each sample of the send path input signal, providing a double-talk indicator to indicate whether or not double-talk has been detected; using the double-talk indicator to determine a double-talk density within a predetermined number of samples of the send path input signal or the receive path input signal; and using the double-talk density to provide a heavy double-talk indicator which indicates whether or not heavy double-talk has been detected. In response to the heavy double-talk indicator indicating that heavy double-talk has been detected, a heavy double-talk mode may be entered.

Echo canceller with heavy double-talk estimation

A technique of operating a communication device includes dividing a frequency band associated with a background noise signal into respective sub-bands. Respective individual level estimates for each of the respective sub-bands are then determined. A total level estimate for the background noise signal is determined. Finally, a comfort noise signal (whose characteristics are based on the respective individual level estimates and the total level estimate) is provided.

Techniques for comfort noise generation in a communication system

Methods and corresponding systems for allocating processing resources for a number of instances (N) of a software component include determining an average processing cost (&#x3bc;) and a variance (&#x3c3;) for the software component. Then a processing cost for the software component is estimated as a function of N, the average processing cost (&#x3bc;), and the variance (&#x3c3;), and processing resources are allocated in response to the estimated processing cost. The software component can be partitioned into a number of blocks (L), wherein the L blocks include a required block and one or more optional blocks. In some embodiments in response to a total estimated processing cost exceeding an available processing value, selected optional blocks can be disabled to reduce the total estimated processing cost to a value equal to or less than the available processing value. The optional blocks can be prioritized and disabled in order of priority.

Growing community of inventors

Campbell, CA, United States of America

Brad L Zwernemann