Fidelity Information Services, LLC

Benjamin Wellmann

David Berglund

Matthew Petersen

Joel E Dake

Damyn L Gessler

Zachary Jasinski

Daniel Wakeman

Eric Bond

Shane W Strunk

Shane M Patzlsberger

Brandon Castro

Per Karlsson

Sheel Saket

Vida Lashkari

Geoffrey Allan Sparke

Gary Duma

Brandon A Castro

Mayur Shiradhonkar

Some aspects of the present disclosure are directed to computer-implemented systems and methods for efficient ticket resolution. The methods may include: receiving a request to resolve an issue; analyzing, via natural language processing, the language in the request to determine the issue to be resolved; determining whether the issue meets a condition for automated resolution; if the condition is met: extracting, via an application programming interface and from the at least one user device, information needed to resolve the issue; and resolving the issue using the extracted information; and if the condition is not met: generating a ticket; assigning a work group to the ticket; determining whether a job aid associated with the issue exists; and forwarding at least one of: the job aid; received communications from the work group; and an estimated amount of time to resolution.

Systems and methods for intelligent ticket management and resolution

A method for improving the quality of a machine-learning based model includes generating a first query requesting a description of a change proposed to a system and an intended outcome of the change proposed; receiving a first response; generating a second query providing a risk of an incident associated with the change proposed and requesting justification of the change proposed in view of the risk; receiving a second response; generating a third query requesting an implementation plan for the change proposed; receiving a third response; generating an alert to an incident owner providing the description, intended outcome, risk, justification, and implementation plan of the change proposed; receiving a risk confirmation or rejection from the incident owner confirming or rejecting a relationship between the change proposed and the risk; and updating the machine-learning based model to learn an association between extracted features of the change and extracted features of the incident.

Systems and methods for improving quality of artificial intelligence model

Systems and methods for activity risk management are disclosed. A system for activity risk management may include a memory storing instructions and at least one processor configured to execute instructions to perform operations including: accessing document data associated with at least one of a transaction or an individual; normalizing the document data; classifying the normalized document data; extracting model input data from the classified document data; applying a machine learning model to the extracted model input data to score the document data, the machine learning model having been trained to generate a favorability output indicating a favorability of the transaction or individual; and generating analysis data based on the scored document data.

Systems and methods for analyzing documents using machine learning techniques

A method for training and using a machine-learning based model to reduce and troubleshoot incidents in a system may include receiving first metadata regarding a previous modification, extracting a first feature from the received first metadata, receiving second metadata regarding a previous incident, extracting a second feature from the received second metadata, training the machine-learning based model to learn an association between the previous modification and the previous incident, based on the extracted first feature and the extracted second feature, and using the machine-learning based model to determine a risk level for a proposed modification to a system.

Systems and methods for risk awareness using machine learning techniques

Systems and methods for entity risk management are disclosed. A system for entity risk management may include a memory storing instructions and at least one processor configured to execute instructions to perform operations including: establishing a connection between the system and a data source, the data source being remote from the system and associated with a first entity; receiving first document data from the data source; normalizing the first document data; classifying the normalized document data; extracting model input data from the classified document data; applying a machine learning model trained to predict risk levels using second document data to the extracted model input data to predict a risk level associated with the first entity; generating analysis data based on the predicted risk level; and based on the analysis data, transmitting an alert to a management device communicably connected to the system.

Systems and methods for using machine learning techniques to predict institutional risks

Growing community of inventors

Boca Raton, FL, United States of America

Benjamin Wellmann