Oracle International Corporation

Ashin George

Kenny C Gross

Guang Chao Wang

Zexi Chen

Rui Zhong

DeJun Li

A double-blind comparison is performed between prognostic-surveillance systems, which are located on a local system and a remote system. During operation, the local system inserts random faults into a dataset to produce a locally seeded dataset, wherein the random faults are inserted into random signals at random times with variable fault signatures. Next, the local system exchanges the locally seeded dataset with a remote system, and in return receives a remotely seeded dataset, which was produced by the remote system by inserting different random faults into the same dataset. Next, the local system uses a local prognostic-surveillance system to analyze the remotely seeded dataset to produce locally detected faults. Finally, the local system determines a performance of the local prognostic-surveillance system by comparing the locally detected faults against actual faults in the remotely seeded fault information. The remote system similarly determines a performance of a remote prognostic-surveillance system.

Using a double-blind challenge to evaluate machine-learning-based prognostic-surveillance techniques

The disclosed embodiments relate to a system that characterizes susceptibility of an inferential model to follow signal degradation. During operation, the system receives a set of time-series signals associated with sensors in a monitored system during normal fault-free operation. Next, the system trains the inferential model using the set of time-series signals. The system then characterizes susceptibility of the inferential model to follow signal degradation. During this process, the system adds degradation to a signal in the set of time-series signals to produce a degraded signal. Next, the system uses the inferential model to perform prognostic-surveillance operations on the set of time-series signals with the degraded signal. Finally, the system characterizes susceptibility of the inferential model to follow degradation in the signal based on results of the prognostic-surveillance operations.

Characterizing susceptibility of a machine-learning model to follow signal degradation and evaluating possible mitigation strategies

The disclosed embodiments relate to a system that camouflages EMI fingerprints in EMI emissions from a computing system to enhance system security. During operation, the system monitors the EMI emissions from the computer system during operation of the computer system to produce corresponding EMI signals. Next, the system determines a dynamic amplitude of the EMI emissions based on the EMI signals. If the dynamic amplitude of the EMI emissions drops below a threshold value, the system executes synthetic transactions, which have interarrival times that, when superimposed on a workload of the computer system, cause the computer system to produce randomized EMI emissions.

Camouflaging EMI fingerprints in enterprise computer systems to enhance system security

The system receives a set of present time-series signals gathered from sensors in the asset. Next, the system uses an inferential model to generate estimated values for the set of present time-series signals, and performs a pairwise differencing operation between actual values and the estimated values for the set of present time-series signals to produce residuals. The system then performs a sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) on the residuals to produce SPRT alarms with associated tripping frequency (TF). While the TF exceeds a TF threshold, the system iteratively adjusts sensitivity parameters for the SPRT to reduce the TF, and performs the SPRT again on the residuals. The system then uses a logistic regression model to compute a risk index for the asset based on the TF. If the risk index exceeds a threshold, the system generates a notification indicating that the asset needs to be replaced.

Adaptive sequential probability ratio test to facilitate a robust remaining useful life estimation for critical assets

The disclosed embodiments relate to a system that determines whether an inferential model is susceptible to spillover false alarms. During operation, the system receives a set of time-series signals from sensors in a monitored system. The system then trains the inferential model using the set of time-series signals. Next, the system tests the inferential model for susceptibility to spillover false alarms by performing the following operations for one signal at a time in the set of time-series signals. First, the system adds degradation to the signal to produce a degraded signal. The system then uses the inferential model to perform prognostic-surveillance operations on the time-series signals with the degraded signal. Finally, the system detects spillover false alarms based on results of the prognostic-surveillance operations.

Characterizing and mitigating spillover false alarms in inferential models for machine-learning prognostics

The disclosed embodiments relate to a system that camouflages electromagnetic interference (EMI) fingerprints in EMI emissions from a computing system to enhance system security. During operation, the system monitors the EMI emissions from the computer system while the computer system is operating to produce corresponding EMI signals. Next, the system performs a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) operation on the EMI signals. The system then converts an output of the FFT operation into a frequency-domain representation of the EMI signals. Next, the system generates a camouflaging signal based on the frequency-domain representation of the EMI signals. Finally, the system outputs the camouflaging signal through a transmitter to camouflage EMI fingerprints in the EMI emissions from the computer system.

Growing community of inventors

San Diego, CA, United States of America

Ashin George