Accenture Global Services Gmbh

Accenture Global Solutions Limited

Anurag Dwarakanath

Sanjay Podder

Neville Dubash

Anitha Chandran

Aditya Priyadarshi

Bargav Jayaraman

Shubhashis Sengupta

Nisha Ramachandra

Bhanu Anand

Bindu Madhav Tummalapalli

Parvathy Vijay Raghavan

Shalini Chaudhari

Kishore P Durg

Roshni Ramesh Ramnani

Samarth Sikand

Manish Ahuja

Vikrant Shyamkant Kaulgud

Alex M Kass

Alpana A Dubey

Kapil Singi

Venkatesh K Subramanian

Adam Patten Burden

Anutosh Maitra

Aniya Aggarwal

Suma Mani Kuriakose

Gurdeep Virdi

Dipin Era

Aditya Bhola

Raghotham M Rao

Shrikanth Narayanaswamy Chandrasekaran

David E Ingram

Jagadeesh Chandra Bose Rantham Prabhakara

Subani Basha Nure

Aruna Jankiti

Pradeepkumar Duraisamy

Brian Ahern

Shrikanth N C

Sakshi Taneja

A device receives a machine learning model, model data associated with the machine learning model, and identifier generation data. The identifier generation data includes data utilized to generate identifier pairs that may be used to authenticate the machine learning model. The device selects an identifier model, for generating the identifier pairs, based on the machine learning model, the model data, and the identifier generation data. The device processes the machine learning model, the model data, and the identifier generation data, with the selected identifier model, to generate the identifier pairs and identifier pair data. The device stores the identifier pairs and the identifier pair data in one or more data structures, and utilizes the identifier pairs to identify and provide authentication for the machine learning model.

Utilizing models to generate identifiers that identify and provide authentication for machine learning models

Systems, apparatuses, and methods are directed towards identifying that an adversarial patch image includes a plurality of pixels. The systems, apparatuses, and methods include dividing the adversarial patch image into a plurality of blocks, that each include a different group of the pixels in which the pixels are contiguous to each other, and assigning a first plurality of colors to the plurality of blocks to assign only one of the first plurality of colors to each pixel of one of the plurality of blocks.

Adversarial patches including pixel blocks for machine learning

In some examples, incident prediction and prevention may include ascertaining a plurality of past incidents, clustering the plurality of past incidents to generate a plurality of incidents clusters, and identifying, for each past incident of the plurality of past incidents that is in a respective incidents cluster of the plurality of incidents clusters, a time of occurrence. Incident prediction and prevention may include ascertaining a new incident, assigning the new incident to an incidents cluster of the plurality of incidents clusters, and determining, for the assigned incidents cluster, at least one further predicted incident associated with at least one further corresponding incidents cluster. Further, incident prediction and prevention may include determining a resolution to the at least one further predicted incident, and preventing occurrence of the at least one further predicted incident by executing the determined resolution to the at least one further predicted incident.

Incident prediction and prevention

A device may determine probabilities for test scripts associated with a test to be executed on a software element, where a respective probability is associated with a respective test script, indicates a likelihood that the respective test script will be unsuccessful in a test cycle, and is determined based on historical test results, associated with the software element, for the respective test script. The device may generate, based on the probabilities, a test script execution order, of the test scripts, for the test cycle, and may execute, based on the test script execution order, the test on the software element in the test cycle. The device may dynamically generate, based on results for the test in the test cycle, an updated test script execution order, and may execute, based on the updated test script execution order, the test on the software element in the test cycle.

Generating a test script execution order

A device may obtain a document. The device may identify a skip value for the document. The skip value may relate to a quantity of words or a quantity of characters that are to be skipped in an n-gram. The device may determine one or more skip n-grams using the skip value for the document. A skip n-gram, of the one or more skip n-grams, may include a sequence of one or more words or one or more characters with a set of occurrences in the document. The sequence of one or more words or one or more characters may include a skip value quantity of words or characters within the sequence. The device may extract one or more terms from the document based on the one or more skip n-grams. The device may provide information identifying the one or more terms.

Automated term extraction

A system may receive task information identifying tasks to be performed by workers of one or more crowds. The system may obtain worker information describing the workers. The system may determine task completion probabilities based on the task information and the worker information. A task completion probability may identify a likelihood that a particular crowd will complete a particular task. The system may determine crowd recommendation information based on the task completion probabilities, the task information, and/or the worker information. The crowd recommendation information may identify recommended crowds to which a task is recommended to be provided. The system may output the crowd recommendation information and/or the worker information to permit selection of the crowds to perform the task.

Crowdsourcing a task

A device may receive, from a user device, a request to verify a machine learning (ML) application using a metamorphic testing procedure. The device may determine a type of ML process used by the ML application, and may select one or more metamorphic relations (MRs), to be used for performing the metamorphic testing procedure, based on the type of ML process. The device may receive test data to be used to test the ML application, wherein the test data is based on the one or more MRs, and may perform, by using the one or more MRs and the test data, the metamorphic testing procedure to verify one or more aspects of the ML application. The device may generate a report that indicates whether the one or more aspects of the ML application have been verified and may provide the report for display on an interface of the user device.

Verification by metamorphic testing of applications that utilize artificial intelligence

A device may receive test scripts that include first information identifying first elements of user interfaces or second information identifying test steps. The test scripts may be written in first text or first program code. The device may process the first text or the first program code of the test scripts. The device may identify the first elements on the user interfaces. The first elements may be identified without using second program code associated with the user interfaces. The first elements may be identified based on a type of the first elements, second text associated with the first elements, or a relationship between the first elements and second elements. The device may identify positions for the first elements. The positions may permit the device to interact with the first elements to perform the test steps. The device may perform the test steps to test the user interfaces.

Device based visual test automation

A device may receive information identifying a first set of instructions. The first set of instructions may identify an action to perform to test a first program. The device may identify a second set of instructions, related to testing a second program, that can be used in association with the first set of instructions. The first test may be similar to the second test. The device may identify multiple steps, of the first set of instructions, that can be combined to form a third set of instructions. The third set of instructions may be used to test the first program or a third program. The device may generate program code in a first programming language to perform the action. The first programming language may be different than a second programming language used to write the first set of instructions. The device may perform the action.

Test automation using multiple programming languages

A device may obtain a test script document. The device may process the test script document to perform term extraction using one or more term extraction techniques to identify a set of terms of the test script document. The one or more term extraction techniques may include a skip n-gram term extraction technique. One or more terms, of the set of terms, may be located within an n-gram of the test script document. The device may process the test script document to perform hierarchy formation for results of performing term extraction. A relationship between a set of terms, of the set of terms, may be identified using hierarchy formation. The device may generate a functional diagram of the test script document based on the results of performing term extraction and results of performing hierarchy formation. The device may provide information identifying the functional diagram.

Automated functional diagram generation

A device may obtain text to be analyzed to identify glossary terms. The device may analyze a linguistic unit to generate multiple linguistic units related to the linguistic unit. The device may analyze the multiple linguistic units to generate potential glossary terms. The device may perform a glossary term analysis on the potential glossary terms to generate glossary terms that include a subset of the potential glossary terms. The device may identify included terms that are included in the glossary terms. The device may identify excluded terms that are excluded from the glossary terms. The device may determine a semantic relatedness score between at least one excluded term and at least one included term. The device may selectively add the excluded linguistic term to the glossary terms to form a final set of glossary terms based on the semantic relatedness score, and may output the final set of glossary terms.

Identifying glossary terms from natural language text documents

A requirements testing system facilitates the review and analysis of requirement statements for software applications. The requirements testing system automatically generates test artifacts from the requirement statements, including test scenarios, test conditions, test hints, and expected results. These test artifacts characterize the requirements statements to provide valuable analysis information that aids understanding what the intentions of the requirement statements are. The automation of the generation of these test artifacts produces numerous benefits, including fewer errors, objectivity, and no dependency on the skills and experience of a creator.

System for generating test scenarios and test conditions and expected results

A system generates a test path set in a very efficient manner. The test path set may be tailored to test a target physical system, such as a complex set of source code, a manufacturing line of multiple process nodes, or other physical system. The system may generate the test path set to meet certain goals in testing the target physical system, for example comprehensive testing of system paths, system nodes, or particular subsets. As one example, the system may efficiently generate a test path set that uses the minimum number of test paths to test a coverage goal, for example traversing each of the prime paths in the target physical system.

Test paths generation for a physical system

A requirements testing system facilitates the review and analysis of requirement statements for software applications. The requirements testing system generates test artifacts from the requirement statements. The test artifacts characterize the requirements statements to provide valuable analysis information that aids understanding whether the requirement statements are testable, what the intentions of the requirement statements are, and other useful analysis information. Because the system generates the analysis information from the requirement statements, the system provides benefits in terms of early feedback along the software application development timeline.

Growing community of inventors

Bengaluru, India

Anurag Dwarakanath