International Business Machines Corporation

Aankur Bhatia

Gary I Givental

Srinivas Babu Tummalapenta

HuyAnh Dinh Ngo

Wesley A Khademi

Paul J Dwyer

Adam Lee Griffin

Carlos E Aguilera

Lu An

Kyle Proctor

Youngja Park

Walid Rjaibi

Thomas S Wallace

Adam J Paquin

Abhishek Basu

Rafal Hajduk

Terry Liggett

Yiye Huang

Luiz Marcel Arbos

Jeffery Crume

Chadwick M Baatz

Mahbod Tavallaee

Joel Rajakumar

Mechanisms are provided for automatically detecting data leakages and generating data leakage detection rules for a rules engine. The rules engine is configured with rules for identifying first sensitive data patterns in input data, and a large language model (LLM) is trained to identify second sensitive data patterns in input data. New input data is processed via the rules engine to determine whether it comprises any of the first sensitive data patterns. In response to the rules engine making a negative determination, the LLM is executed on the new input data to determine whether the new input data comprises any of the second sensitive data patterns. Responsive to a positive determination by the LLM, the rules engine is updated with a new rule based on the at least one second data pattern.

Data leakage protection using generative large language models

A technique for threat response associated with an endpoint detection and response (EDR) system. The system uses a combination of automated observable detection, threat intelligence enrichment, graph analysis, and supervised machine learning to machine-predict analyst behavior in classifying (as 'true' or ‘false’ positives) the EDR alerts, and to support either (i) automated suppression of those alerts that the system classifies with sufficient confidence as either true or false, or (ii) for those alerts than cannot be so classified, the providing of recommendations to analysts to facilitate their activities. Auto-detection of observables for graph-based feature detection, together with the automated disposition of alerts where possible greatly reduces overall analyst workload for the EDR system. Further, and even where a machine-based prediction does not have sufficient confidence to enable bypassing the analyst, the system provides the analyst with additional context and enrichment to facilitate expedited (or at least more efficient) alert handling.

Auto-detection of observables and auto-disposition of alerts in an endpoint detection and response (EDR) system using machine learning

An enhanced threat disposition analysis technique is provided. In response to receipt of a security threat identified in an alert, a threat disposition score (TDS) is retrieved. The TDS is generated from a machine learning scoring model that is built from information about historical security threats, including historical disposition of one or more alerts associated with the historical security threats. The TDS is based in part on an effectiveness of a prior calculated TDS to predict a particular historical disposition associated with the alert. The system augments an alert to include the threat disposition score, optionally together with a confidence level, to generate an enriched alert. The enriched alert is then presented to the security analyst for handling directly. Preferably, the machine learning model is updated continuously as the system handles security threats, thereby increasing the predictive benefit of the TDS scoring.

Threat disposition analysis and modeling using supervised machine learning

An enhanced threat disposition analysis technique is provided. In response to receipt of a security threat, a threat disposition score (TDS) is retrieved. The threat disposition score is generated from a machine learning scoring model that is built from information about historical security threats, including historical disposition of one or more alerts associated with the historical security threats. The system augments an alert to include the threat disposition score, optionally together with a confidence level, to generate an enriched alert. The enriched alert is then presented to the security analyst for handling directly. Depending on the TDS (and its confidence level), the analyst may be able to respond to the threat immediately, i.e., without further detailed investigation. Preferably, the machine learning model is updated continuously as the system handles security threats, thereby increasing the predictive benefit of the TDS scoring.

An example operation may include one or more of receiving storage requests endorsed by blockchain peers of a blockchain, selecting a group of the endorsed storage requests to be stored together and ordering the group of endorsed storage requests with respect to each other based on timestamps, encoding the group of ordered and endorsed storage requests into an image, and storing the encoded image within a data section of a block of the blockchain.

Image encoding for blockchain

A method, a computer program product, and a system for performing a of threat similarity analysis for automated action on security alerts. The method includes receiving, by a threat similarity analysis system, a security alert relating to a security from a threat disposition system within an environment, performing, by the threat similarity analysis system, a similarity analysis on the security alert using a machine learning model. The similarity analysis compares the security alert with previous security alerts within a time window. The threat similarity analysis system can apply a cosine similarity analysis to perform the similarity analysis. The method also includes determining, based on the similarity analysis, the security alert matches at least one previous security alert from the previous security alerts within a predetermined degree, and associating the security alert into a same security incident as the previous security alert determined by similarity analysis.

Similarity analysis for automated disposition of security alerts

A machine learning model selector is provided. A set of machine learning (ML) models are trained based on a first training dataset. The set of trained ML model is executed on a second training dataset to generate a corresponding output for a set of data instances in the second training dataset. For each data instance in the set of data instances, a corresponding ranking of ML models is generated based on the corresponding output for the data instance generated by the set of ML models. A ML model selector is trained based on the data instances in the set of data instances and the corresponding ranking of ML models, to select a trained ML model based on an input data instance.

Dynamic machine learning model selection

Mechanisms are provided to implement an ensemble of unsupervised machine learning (ML) models. The ensemble of unsupervised ML models processes a portion of input data to generate an ensemble output and the ensemble output is output to an authorized user computing device to obtain user feedback from the authorized user via the user computing device. The user feedback indicates a correctness of the ensemble output. The mechanisms modify at least one feature of the ensemble of unsupervised ML models based on the obtained user feedback to thereby generate a modified ensemble of unsupervised ML models. Subsequent portions of input data are then processed using the modified ensemble of unsupervised ML models.

Modification of machine learning model ensembles based on user feedback

Embodiments of a method are disclosed. The method includes determining that the event type of an event log of a security information and event management (SIEM) cannot be identified. The method further includes generating a vectorized log using a cleaned, tokenized, and padded version of the event log. Additionally, the method includes generating a classification for the vectorized log using a deep learning classification model that is trained to identify a potential event type for the event log based on deep learning training using multiple parsed logs. The method also includes determining that a confidence level of the classification meets a predetermined threshold. The method further includes parsing the event log based on the classification.

Identifying siem event types

Mechanisms are provided to implement a hybrid machine learning (ML) anomaly detector comprising an ensemble of unsupervised ML models and a semi-supervised ML model. The ensemble of unsupervised ML models are executed on log data to generate, for each entry in the log data, a predicted anomaly score and corresponding anomaly classification label of the entry. A partially labeled dataset is generated based on a selected subset of entries and other unlabeled log data in the log data. A similarity analysis of the unlabeled log data with entries in the selected subset of entries is performed and anomaly classification labels of the selected subset of entries are propagated to the other unlabeled log data based on the similarity analysis.

Hybrid machine learning to detect anomalies

A method provides an intermediate mitigation of a vulnerability in a particular computer system. One or more processors receive a description of a vulnerability of a computer system to a malicious attack. The processor(s) perform an NLP analysis of the description of the vulnerability in order to extract risk information related to the vulnerability, where the risk information includes an identity of a type of vulnerable computer system resource in the computer system. The processor(s) match the vulnerable computer system resource to a computer system resource in a particular computer system, and perform an intermediate mitigation action that reduces a functionality of the computer system resource in the particular computer system until a solution is implemented that both restores the functionality of the computer system resource in the particular computer system and mitigates the vulnerability of the particular computer system to the malicious attack.

Security protection rule prediction and enforcement

A method assigns a particular rule for a previous client to a new client for use in executing a security feature on a computer system used by the new client. One or more processors match a new client profile for the new client to a previous client profile for the previous client. The new client profile is based on types of one or more client assets of the new client and an intrusion detection alert history of the new client. The processor(s) assign the particular rule for the previous client to the new client based on the new client profile matching the previous client profile. The processor(s) receive information indicating that a violation of the particular rule has occurred, and execute a security feature of the computer system used by the new client in order to resolve the violation of the particular rule.

Artificial intelligence assisted rule generation

A method identifies and prioritizes anomalies in received monitoring logs from an endpoint log source. One or more processors identify anomalies in the monitoring logs by applying a plurality of disparate types of anomaly detection algorithms to the monitoring logs, and then determine a likelihood that the identified anomalies are anomalous based on outputs of the plurality of disparate types of anomaly detection algorithms. The processor(s) then prioritize the monitoring logs based on the likelihood that the identified anomalies are actually anomalous, and send prioritized monitoring logs that exceed a priority level to a security information and event management system (SIEM).

Detecting and responding to an anomaly in an event log

An example operation may include one or more of retrieving a predefined image from a storage, encoding data attributes to be stored on a blockchain into one or more image layers of the predefined image to generate an encoded image, generating a data block comprising the encoded image including the data attributes which are encoded into the one or more image layers, and storing the data block via a hash-linked chain of data blocks on a distributed ledger.

Multi-layered image encoding for data block

Mechanisms for performing advanced rule analysis are provided. The mechanisms perform natural language processing of a security rule set data structure, specifying a plurality of security rules. The mechanisms execute, for each security rule pairing, a determination of a similarity measure indicating a degree of similarity of the textual description of the first security rule in the pairing with the textual description of the second security rule in the pairing, and in response to the security measure being equal to or above duplicate rule threshold value, eliminating one of the first security rule or the second security rule in the pairing from the security rule set data structure to generate a modified security rule set data structure. The mechanisms deploy the modified security rule set data structure to a computing environment for use in identifying security incidents and performing event management.

Growing community of inventors

Bethpage, NY, United States of America

Aankur Bhatia